Leagues
May 05, 2024, 03:51 AM

Game #131062, reported by ren4n, Viewed 345 Time(s)

HAL #1
Singles
November 20, 2012, 02:53 PM
Winner
vuLt
Brazil n
Absolute Beginner 1000 in HAL Aerial before the game. Gained 41|41 points
Loser
RaChACuCa
Brazil BLACK tS CWC
Absolute Beginner 1032 in HAL Aerial before the game. Lost 41|41 points
  

Game Rate
Not rated yet
Players history
1 - 0
1 - 0
1 - 1
1 - 1
Information Game scheme: HAL Aerial
Scheme pick: Winner's pick
Watch The Game Replay(s):
Downloaded 46 time(s).
Game Awards
This game hasn't been nominated for any awards.
Game Map(s)

Random generated map by the game.
1920 x 696, LEV, 0.03 KB, Downloaded 4 time(s)

Game Chat(s)
[RaCHaCuCaA] ok jaƩ hf
[b0r`ren4n] 2
[RaCHaCuCaA] faill ;/
[RaCHaCuCaA] saiii
[b0r`ren4n] kkkk
[RaCHaCuCaA] kk
[b0r`ren4n] sei joga isso n
[b0r`ren4n] haha
[RaCHaCuCaA] :)
[RaCHaCuCaA] eu tmb nao sei nao
[RaCHaCuCaA] ..
[b0r`ren4n] lol
[RaCHaCuCaA] bl
[b0r`ren4n] oq eh essa caixa que peguei
[RaCHaCuCaA] uu
[RaCHaCuCaA] tem varias armas..
[b0r`ren4n] af
[RaCHaCuCaA] XD
[RaCHaCuCaA] era pra cair na mina XD
[RaCHaCuCaA] ;/
[b0r`ren4n] lol
[b0r`ren4n] gg
[RaCHaCuCaA] wtf
[b0r`ren4n] gg
[RaCHaCuCaA] porra
[b0r`ren4n] cria ai hyst
[RaCHaCuCaA] mole da porra

Author Topic: Game #131062, reported by ren4n  (Read 341 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HHC

Game #131062, reported by ren4n
« on: November 20, 2012, 03:11 PM »
isn't this a HAL game ren4n?

you reported it as free league :o
Need to set the scheme to HAL Aerial and not Aerial.

Offline franz

Re: Game #131062, reported by ren4n
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2012, 11:03 PM »
switched it to HAL

Offline HHC

Re: Game #131062, reported by ren4n
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2012, 11:15 PM »
is it confirmed though?

I just suggested cause racha reported a hal hysteria just before. They could have made a really weird deal  :-[

Offline franz

Re: Game #131062, reported by ren4n
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2012, 11:30 PM »
ah, thought you played it for a sec ^^ hence your post.

your assumption seems logical though, but we can change it back if he wants.