hoi 

They had to be turned PC? 

Best of luck in your life matey. See you in the 2030's perhaps 

Quote from: philie on August 14, 2018, 11:31 PM
im late but hb

no worries, I was on holiday 

thanks buddies, appreciated.

ty for the cake charles 

ALLOYYY

A lot of modern boardgames are pretty demanding, it has to be said. Catan is just within reach. You cannot expect people to learn 10+ pages of rules by heart, cause that usually takes about 10 hours.. which is too long for pick-up-and-play.
And most of the time, the easiest to learn games are the most fun.
Complicated ones are often 'scripted' and have the same outcome 9 out of 10 times.

Playing them on PC is far easier, I have a lot on Steam, but the downside usually is the dumb AI + crappy online multiplayer mode.

hey sensei! look at this!!



Haters gonna hate. Huskies pile was godlike.

I dunno. I can't recall doing fort or pro against really good clans, for the highest level. That by all means doesn't imply that I didn't actually play them.

I have a penis for a brain, and it's wee small 

Love doing random searches in spotify 

Quote from: philie on July 21, 2018, 10:03 PM
we had xD

Lol, looks like this camelo never saw any real sand before 

Wow. I thought Husk's was impressive, but this one is even better. How did you stack your entire monitor on top of these tiny stones?? 

lol I wish daina practiced for 3 days as well before facing me. That's quite an honour tbh 

Was this part of the deal btw? I thought it was about a random veteran being able to beat Zalo in mole with 0 experience in mole. Three days of practice... that makes daina into a fulltime moleshop player doesn't it?
(*I'm dealing good punches here atm *)

My support is all for my moleymates.

I don't get your point of view at all Komo. You're all for innovation and allowing new schemes in. Yet at the same time you want to strip these schemes to make them..... like Anchored BnG lol

I've had this in my profile for ages:

QuoteHHC's wormy gospel:
Schemes oughta be:
1) complete - no 2-weapon games, but schemes that make use of as many weapons as possibly can without f*ckin up the game balance.
2) competitive - noob can stand somewhat of a chance vs the pro's.
3) easy to understand - no long lists of houserules and unwritten cheapness laws.
4) challenging and unpredictable (!).
5) FUN

The current scheme-issues are the fault of the players who keep on urging for more 'skill-based' play.
They have stripped every scheme to its very core and removed all things that could make it 'unpredictable'.
The logical result: 1) 2-weapon games; 2) not competitive; 3) hard to understand; 4) no-fun; 5) predictable > the ultimate boredom.

I have spoken, let it be heard!

I'm gonna be bold and say that it's people like you who are partly, if not mostly, to blame for the league's current sad state.
Had the veterans be more open to new wormers and their schemes and implement the much needed reforms, maybe, maybe we would have a thriving league now.

But nop, it's still 3 players doing the same ol' boring classic schemes that nobody on wormnet plays.

yeh, but y'know it's that damn Bavarian pride of his.

I voted Never. 

Quote from: TheKomodo on July 25, 2018, 04:49 PM
Competitive Worms is like real life, the gap between the rich and poor, good and bad, just gets bigger and bigger.

Am I wrong?

Well it sure is gonna be that way if you call the schemes you play Elite and league-worthy and discard every new scheme as noob and not fit for any kind of skill contest/comparison.

It would be a lot closer if you took the fight to their home ground.

Quote from: Senator on July 25, 2018, 03:59 PM
If you are going to make a league for new players, you can cut Elite and Hysteria.. People don't play those schemes on WormNet so why would they be interested?

Hysteria too?? That was the most pop when I left.

Which schemes then? Shopper and moleshopper? Inter?