komo you're against this just because people would ban bng every time vs you.

Since you can't avoid this behaviour completely, why not regulate it.

Any opinions?

Ok guys listen let's cut the crap.

There might be a solution for all this. We could do like in all the major tournaments of other games: the ability to ban a scheme.
This means that both teams, before picking their scheme, have the option to ban 1 scheme from the match. This gives interesting strategic options to clans without doing pussy crap and still staying inside strict rules.

I would prefer this instead of arguing and loosing time searching for clanners when people simply won't play certain schemes.
Remember that if you ban the opponent's strongest scheme you won't get a big advantage because of how points work. This could be a valid rule to apply if everybody agrees.

Quote from: Senator on June 08, 2016, 08:40 AM
A free win gives a message like "don't pick this scheme again". You don't want to report a free win more than once and it makes u pick something else. No good. I admit that VoK and I have just clowned around in RR in some occasions, which is like giving a free win. You should play the pick and try your best even if u hate the scheme. You can always do the same to your opponent and pick the scheme that he hates the most. It's up to players whether they want 2 games where either player has no fun or 2 games where both players have fun.

I don't understand picking the opponent's weakest scheme when that means hardly any points and an unbalanced game, though (when u don't need to improve your winning ratio). People just want a worthless win on their record or what? Now Komo says that he enjoys BnG even if his opponent sucks but at least for me there's no fun if there's no real opponent. I don't usually pick my opponent's weakest scheme but a scheme where I'm a slight favorite. I get an exciting game and good points.

wise words #2

Quote from: Aerox on June 08, 2016, 07:31 AM
I read you non ropers, this ain't about points, this is about enjoyment or lack of thereof. Right?

So if you can't rope and despise doing so, when your opponent picks it, give him a free win and play your pick. End of the story.

We don't adulterate standings so everyone can enjoy the league in their own magical personal way, that's not how you do things. If people need a specific set of personal rules to have fun in an all around league they need to either adapt or find something else but not expect the rules to mold around their ineptitude.

wise words

Get some balls, loose some matches and get better. Even after 8 years of sucking.

And trust me, when a clan feels its loosing because some schemes are hard, they will try to get new players or force some inactive friends to come back. We did it, why can't you? (and we even use whatsapp)

For me it's very simple.

To win the classic league you have to play all schemes in playoffs.
What's the point of playing a league that u can't even think of winning? Not even in 2 years?

Not sure about you but I would hate to be considered an avoider. Cmon people, if you can't even pretend to be tough online what the f@#! are you in Real Life? A depressed wet towel?

Quote from: nino on June 07, 2016, 04:00 PM
In name of DT i say sorry 

hauhauhauha BL ae xD

uhauhaha nino <3

Quote from: Ryan on June 07, 2016, 03:26 PM
Learn to play other schemes.

exactly.

Quote from: Peja on June 07, 2016, 03:16 PM
suggest changes?

Easy change:

Asking for clanners should be made only this way: you ask for clanner or you don't ask for clanner.
Accepting a clanner should be made only this way: either you agree on playing it or you don't.

No conditions for the clanner should be made whatsoever. Every clan that tries to put conditions should be reported and get a penalty.

Wanted to add something:

I can understand that some clans may have some good ground players that don't play ropes at all. But from the moment you agreed on playing a clanner you should be aware of that and decide to "risk" and play, or either decide not to play at all. There should be no "we play only if..." bullshit.

I encourage everyone to screenshot any person saying that and post it here. So maybe at least we can have some laughs for how pussy they are.

Hi people.

I recently came back to WA and was about to play a clanner with sbaffo.
DT agreed to play a clanner vs us then when games were about to start they said "we will play clanner only if you don't pick ropes"

The purpose of the "picks" system is exactly to avoid this, because obviously every clan has their strong schemes and their bad ones. So it seems pretty fair to me for every clan to be able to pick whatever scheme they want, since we are playing TUS CLASSIC, that is made for all-round wormers.

So my point is: if you are not an all-rounder why should you be allowed to play tus classic? From my point of view it should be forbidden to force in any way the opponent to pick a scheme or to exclude another. Since a clan agrees for a clanner that's it. Games should be starting with no "but" or "if".

Please share your opinion with me guys, because this really seems bullshit to me.

esatto

i will spank walrus ass

Quote from: ANO on June 03, 2016, 08:14 AM
orange is on travel.. I will tell him.. maybe he s gonna be back soon

i'm back. register me pleeeeease