Quote from: ZiPpO on August 29, 2010, 08:21 PM
mablak play ropers...in default he inst better than me and crash.. maybe in intermediate but intermediate inst in classic league.

I disagree, I personally think Mablak is better than you at ALL league games. He is definately better at you at BnG, I know that for a fact.

<3 avi - *hugs*

And coming to think about it, after putting more thought into it, an exceptional defaulter with better knowledge of weapons will probably beat an exceptional roper with less knowledge of the weapons in a shopper.

And WxW is an all-round scheme i'd say, as it takes both good rope skill & how to use the weapons to the best of their ability.

Quote from: DarkOne on August 29, 2010, 02:15 PM

Quote from: Komo on August 29, 2010, 09:10 AM
* You must have some trial and error here? Why not just try it out? If it doesn't work, just remove it again? I think it's worthy enough of trying out...

What do you think we're doing with making it an option?

It's not really a proper option though is it? As it does not have a seperate section... We can't really tell how many are being played, unless someone watches EVERY roper to find out if it is w2Roper or not...

And actually Random said there are 4 rope based schemes and 4 default based schemes, this is correct, but I also just realised, Shopper isn't hugely dependent on using rope is it? I mean you need MUCH more knowledge of the weapons, as roping around on more or less all shoppers is really easy... SO I'd say shopper is somewhere inbetween, so adding w2Rope as a 9th scheme, to me would make it like 4/1/4, but then again, this is my personal opinion...

Lol I didn't even notice nino saying that, my bad ! nino, you are a bad boy !

Quote from: Ramone on August 29, 2010, 12:01 PM
@Shy: I am not taking any sides here, I just comment what I see and what I don't like.. and that's avi's way of "solving" things: "ya stupid f@#!ing retards should be banned cause U avoid to play w2roper!" .. maaan, I really do understand, but that's not the way!

I know who and what are Zippo and Crash, I don't need to take a look at their karma, I ain't here from yesterday... I have reacted cause I hate it (in RL too) when I see that someone is leg-hitting someone who is lying down on the ground already beaten up in bruises.. It's so damn easy and lame...

@avi: I personally really couldn't care less about your "suck ass" personality thing, but it's not about me, it's about making TUS forums looks ugly and jerky with that attitude/language...
Don't U see that 90% of ppl here tells U to calm down too?
And I wonder that your clan mate nino haven't teach and preach U already about having a bit more of Jesus soul in your heart ;x

In fact, all I wanted to say with my post is the same thing that SPW has told in one line:

Quote from: SPW on August 29, 2010, 10:03 AM
TUS needs a new reform. Tolerance and respect should be at top and a harder line is defently needed.   

But imo not by banning players, but by censoring all the "f@#! shit pussies asshole dickheads" conversations... All ya need is some respect and tolerance.. and a bit more Jesus in your heart 

While I agree with most of this, I would ask you not to preach religion please, some people do not believe in such things, talking about Jesus even with people than believe in other religions can go down a bad road...

Hmm, you have a good point there Random, about 4/4...

I never looked at it that way...

However I still find it unfair to be able to use the same points as Roper, but I guess that's my opinion...

Cool, thanks MI, it's nice when you say something out of curiosity and it turns out to be a good idea

Lol avi...

Quote from: darKz on August 29, 2010, 10:34 AM

Quote from: Komo on August 29, 2010, 10:18 AM
I wouldn't let someone attack me from chute since is specifically says attack from rope, obviously excluding ground weapons like shotgun etc...

You'd most likely lose the complaint though, attacking from chute has been considered the same as attack from rope for ages now, and I don't see why it shouldn't, it's not exactly easier. Maybe someone add it explicitly to the rules, lol.

It says AFR, so techically, I should win the complaint, because it doesn't say it in the rules as of yet.

They cannot allow something that isn't in the rules, that goes against the point of having rules does it not?

They can obviously add this if they want, and then I wouldn't be bothered...

The same way criminals can do things that are wrong, or win in court, because it is not an official law.

Lol @ Shyguy telling campz what to do haha, classic

Lol @ random pm's about shui

Quote from: SPW on August 29, 2010, 10:03 AM

Quote from: nino on August 28, 2010, 09:40 PM
They care to much and should be banned for sure. c'mom admins..ill leave that f@#!ing game..stuff like this really piss me offfffffff u sit on chair to relax, play a bit and have a laugh and u have to face with idiots like this all the time? and you guys (admins) already knows their reputation and make nothing, thats sad really.

so damn true.

+1 frustrating level every single day. Wanna keep them "playing" and lose some nice and fair wormers? DO SOMETHING! This is like a Village without a Sheriff.

btw avi, u should calm down a bit too. I dont compare you with z*** and c*** but ur not fair all the way tho. A little donky makes shit too.

MOD's: I would be free for a meeting in our voice server. MI and D1 and some guys like Nino, Random00, darKz, Komo (..)

TUS needs a new reform. Tolerance and respect should be at top and a harder line is defently needed.

Count me in.

I wouldn't let someone attack me from chute since is specifically says attack from rope, obviously excluding ground weapons like shotgun etc...

Quote from: DarkOne on August 29, 2010, 08:45 AM
@ 1) w2roper is an option to the scheme. It hasn't been played long enough on WA to be accepted as a regular scheme. There have been plenty of people wanting it to be possible, but there have also been plenty of people not wanting it in the schemes. Having it as an option is the middle ground; people who want it can play it, but people who don't want it don't have to.

Just add it as a regular scheme with it's own rating and selection in the report pages, still with the choice you do not have to play it so that:

* We can see how many are being played.
* More might be played due to the fact it doesn't affect the original Roper standings, as it IS after all, a different scheme.
* When I voted no to this, I only voted no to being forced to play it, I didn't want it to affect normal Roper standings...
* You must have some trial and error here? Why not just try it out? If it doesn't work, just remove it again? I think it's worthy enough of trying out...

Yes but what I am saying is that, if w2Roper was actually a seperate scheme, and didn't affect Roper standings as they are 2 different things, I would probably play it now and again because I do like it.

I will not play it as as it is now because I don't want to change other ratings when it shouldn't...

And how are you supposed to see how many w2Ropers are being played if it doesn't have its own selection?

Ooooooooooh MonkeyISLAND !!!!!

Hint hint, wink wink, nuuuudge nuuuuudge