So, whats your opinion on what i just said Chelsea???
im curious what other people think too...
do you think for example 10 small, maybe 3-4 person clans has more potential to increase clanner activity??
or do you think less clans.. example 5 clans, with 6-10 people per clan has more potential for increased activity??
as i said above, i really think larger clans is the answer... who really cares if your playing the same clans more frequent... at least it would most likely be different people each time... and the fact of the matter is, when your online with a clan mate of your own, your going to have increased chances to find a clan that is also online with at least 1 other clan mate.
a bunch of small clans at first thought seems like a great idea, but if anyone actually thinks about it, i think they would quickly realize it would decrease the chances of not only having a clan mate of your own online, but also finding a clan that has 2 members available when you do.
so, what is other peoples opinions?? and if you disagree with me, lets hear some reasons why.. maybe you can change my opinion.
but, i do think something has to be done... clanner activity is going down hill, and we need to figure out a way to turn that around.
i really think some of these smaller, less active clans should merge together... make a bigger clan so you can actually play clanner...
example: chelsea, when is the last time you were on wnet, and had one of your clan mates online??? how often does that actually happen??? and when it does, is it easy for you to find a clanner???
say what you guys want about dt having a wopping 6 members playing clanners, but maybe we are on to something?? maybe others should follow our lead

notice we generally have most games played? just sayin'
ps: this entire thread should be moved to a more appropriate forum.. im gonna PM D1 to see if he can do that, so others see this conversation, and hopefully get involved.