you guys are pretty funny:
current situation: harpy leaves when he is forced to play rope games >>>> no game played
situation if your suggestion is approved: harpy does not play because he does not like rope games >> no game played
the outcome would be the same
the problem of tus is not avoiding, the problem of tus is a point system which encourages noob bashing by default.
sbaffo would get around 40 points for beating harpy in a roper, which quite equal to the default amount of points you get for winning anyone at the start of the season, so lets just call it average. but harpy cant rope for shit, in fact he is worse than myself. despite this, sbaffo would only get 25 points if he beats me in a roper. sbaffo playing roper against harpy should not have any influence on standings, unless harpy turns into an average roper. this game would never happen in any kind of matchmaking system, because sbaffo is one of the best ropers of all time, while harpy is one of the worst.
trying to get the reward of beating an average player, while playing an below average player seems pretty lame in my eyes.