Would it be interesting to establish that in the PO system the player can only choose 1 rope scheme, unless both agreed to choose more?
When the roping skill gap between 2 players is big, the player who like rope schemes and has good skills with rope has guaranteed wins in roper, rope race, ttrr or wxw.
I will make a comparison. My favorite scheme is intermediate. I have an advantage in this scheme compared to many players who do not like/play this scheme. Now imagine if I could choose intermediate, 80normal and freemediate (if you are very good at intermediate, you will have a good advantage in these schemes). Although I don't play 80normal and freemediate a lot, as they are more similar to intermediate, I would take a good advantage over those who don't like intermediate. The same goes for rope schemes. Someone who is pro with rope will also have a huge advantage in any schemes where rope skill is the most important against people who don't play rope schemes.
In my last PO against VoK, I already knew that I would have two losses in the rope schemes he choose (he likes to pick wxw and roper). It's okay for people to pick rope in the PO and have a guaranteed win against the opponent who doesn't play rope schemes. But being able to choose up to 3 rope schemes in a PO maybe it's not the best choice.
Perhaps the PO could be like this: choose 1 rope scheme; aerial or hysteria; intermediate; BnG; team 17; Elite. The picks in this way would be between schemes that don't have much similarity to each other. In other words, if a person is very good at one, they will not necessarily be good at the other (unlike what happens when a pro roper can choose wxw, roper, ttrr and RR).
I think the idea of alrround PO should be to recognize players who specialize in different schemes. If someone specializes in rope, it's obvious that he's going to win any rope scheme against someone who doesn't have good rope skills. But if someone specializes in intermediate, that doesn't guarantee he'll be good at Team 17 or hysteria, for example.
EDIT (final suggestion):
After reading the comments (disregarding the troll comment) I bring here a suggestion that I think could be more fair and transmit better the spirit of allround:
In allround PO players should play all allround schemes (if it's allround PO why not make it really allround?) with the following peculiarities:
1 BnG match
1 Aerial match
1 Hysteria match
1 Rope match (scheme chosen by the best positioned in the rope league)
1 Elite match
1 Intermediate match
1 Team17 match
Other alternative:
1 BnG
1 Aerial or Hysteria (choosen by the best positioned in default league)
1 Rope scheme (choosen by the best positioned in rope league)
1 Elite or intermediate (choosen by the best positioned in default league)
1 Team17 match