How an avoiding rule would work

[fr4nk]

Ah, another little off topic:
[17:37:12] [fr4nks] Chelsea clanner?
[17:37:20] Quit: `RB`GadZeT`e2N ( [The Wheat Snooper] The Wheat Snooper 2.
[17:37:23] Quit: Cangrejin (Hosting a game: Cangrejin)
[17:37:26] Join: mimo.
[17:37:30] Join: Benhur.
[17:37:31] [mimo] !host tower
[17:37:34] Join: maryjane.
[17:37:36] Quit: mimo (Joined Game)
[17:37:38] [Benhur] !host shopper
[17:37:41] [Chelsea`eS] I won't playa gain you....

[DarkOne]

I suppose the killing-Chelsea-with-a-bat thing gave him that idea, fr4nk.

The big question is here is how far you want to make this avoiding rule go. Thing is - if they want to win a season, they're gonna have to play against the good clans anyway or they're out.

[DENnis]

I suppose the killing-Chelsea-with-a-bat thing gave him that idea, fr4nk.

The big question is here is how far you want to make this avoiding rule go. Thing is - if they want to win a season, they're gonna have to play against the good clans anyway or they're out.

But without all that noobbashing and avoiding there would be only/more fair people in the Play Offs.

It would work if TUS program it like u have to play minimal 1 out of 7 games vs a simular ranked guy (maximal vs. some1 where the noobbasher would only get -45 points, that would mean he has to play vs. some1 who is on a simular skilllevel)

Like that or even a bit harder would mean u cant do 20 games in a row vs an absolut beginner if u r like "highly competent".

Just a little filter so that no more 15-0 noobbashing in a row is possible.

[Dub-c]

I suppose the killing-Chelsea-with-a-bat thing gave him that idea, fr4nk.

The big question is here is how far you want to make this avoiding rule go. Thing is - if they want to win a season, they're gonna have to play against the good clans anyway or they're out.

But without all that noobbashing and avoiding there would be only/more fair people in the Play Offs.

It would work if TUS program it like u have to play minimal 1 out of 7 games vs a simular ranked guy (maximal vs. some1 where the noobbasher would only get -45 points, that would mean he has to play vs. some1 who is on a simular skilllevel)

Like that or even a bit harder would mean u cant do 20 games in a row vs an absolut beginner if u r like "highly competent".

Just a little filter so that no more 15-0 noobbashing in a row is possible.

I already have an idea for this also. But 1 thing at a time

[Wolfgang]

I see some guys u ask clanner and they asking u ''what u pick''   if u say rrtt roper or something they say u no, dunno why they want only 1 pick and no ur pick lol

[TheKomodo]

I see some guys u ask clanner and they asking u ''what u pick''   if u say rrtt roper or something they say u no, dunno why they want only 1 pick and no ur pick lol

I don't think there is anything wrong with that, being open and honest with your strong/weak schemes.

For me it's the clans who ask for clanner, and when you reply, they suddenly go AFK only to host a clanner vs another clan a few minutes later.

^^ Same goes for singles.

[avirex]

Yea, i agree with what komo said.. Mm has alot of goood ttrr guys who worked hard to build the points... So i rly dont like to play ttrr if its just me and 1 other member

I often like to agree on two picks, so everyonrs happy...

Like komo said, its the ones who flat out avoid completely that are annoying

[TheWalrus]

Like komo said, its the ones who flat out avoid completely that are annoying

I find it absurd how blatant eS is about avoiding, i mean easy straight out says it here:

bah the worst is u are our 2 leaders dont undestand we must not play against ps

gg PO

I mean, come on.

From this thread:
https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/games-comments/game-114938-reported-by-dulek/?action=post;quote=127251;num_replies=1;sesc=0804938da78262a53766607fab00957f

[Dub-c]

It's just frustrating that there is so many gaps in the rules. Its easier to find a damn game of chess on Tus then to find the rules.

[GreatProfe]

Like komo said, its the ones who flat out avoid completely that are annoying

I find it absurd how blatant eS is about avoiding, i mean easy straight out says it here:

bah the worst is u are our 2 leaders dont undestand we must not play against ps

gg PO

I mean, come on.

From this thread:
https://www.tus-wa.com/forums/games-comments/game-114938-reported-by-dulek/?action=post;quote=127251;num_replies=1;sesc=0804938da78262a53766607fab00957f

What 1 eS member thinks isnt what the eS leaders think. It's in the same link what u posted.

[Aerox]

So can we have a response on this? It's been what? Weeks...

I'm sure anyone in the staff can give us a hint on what's going on, or if this is in the plan books.

I don't want to disturb MI's coding of the new TUSbook profile sharing ladder climbing worms and friends website TM but I don't think it's asking too much to know if an avoiding rule system is being worked or if he simply doesn't give a f@#! or doesn't prioritize it.

[MonkeyIsland]

Why do you care ropa? So TUS becomes a better league? The only-god-damn-league-that-we-have-no-other-choice finally make a little more sense?

[TheKomodo]

Well, i'd like to know as well MonkeyIsland.

The ONLY reason I don't play TuS Singles overall properly is because there is no avoiding rule, and I think the top 20 players list is a joke.

Anyone can play anyone as much as they like up to 15 games, and avoid whoever they want, it's f@#!ING PATHETIC, excuse my French

[Statik]

I think this issue can be solved only by searching TUS games via the TUS site (pretty logical, huh?).

Player/Clan A presses "Find a TUS game" button and waits for the random opponent. Then Player/Clan B presses his button and both get the message "Game found!" or smth... If one of them denies to play, then he loses points. It would be also nice to select preferable schemes by both sides, so they will play only one of those schemes and there won't be "my pick - your pick" rule.

One more benefit: don't need to spam AG with "TUS NE1 TUS NE1 TUS NE1".

But I guess it's not that easy to code. Just an idea

[Casso]

I think this issue can be solved only by searching TUS games via the TUS site (pretty logical, huh?).

Player/Clan A presses "Find a TUS game" button and waits for the random opponent. Then Player/Clan B presses his button and both get the message "Game found!" or smth... If one of them denies to play, then he loses points. It would be also nice to select preferable schemes by both sides, so they will play only one of those schemes and there won't be "my pick - your pick" rule.

One more benefit: don't need to spam AG with "TUS NE1 TUS NE1 TUS NE1".

But I guess it's not that easy to code. Just an idea

This would be great ! +1