Forums
May 03, 2024, 12:19 PM

Author Topic: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners  (Read 4111 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners
« Reply #30 on: March 29, 2011, 02:27 PM »
I haven't bothered replying to any posts in here because:

A) I forgot that I even posted this
B) I rarely log in to TUS
C) I'm too busy most of the time to discuss shit in a forum

zzzzz, whatever.

Why post post bullshit like that? You didnt reply here cos u threw a hissy fit and got owned by everyone. You didnt forget about anything. You're not too busy to "discuss shit in a forum" COS UR DOING IT NOW! You also had lengthy discussions with me and those idiots on the Worms Reloaded Steam forums (where I was banned ages ago)!


My main point was/is that in my personal opinion, Hysteria is a bullshit scheme for clanners. For funners, it's great.. especially if I am in an impatient mood and don't want to wait around for minutes between turns. Would anyone play a BnA clanner?  ::)

No. Your main point was that the rules of league hysteria should be changed to suit the needs of people who lack the ability to plan a strategical game. Whats the title of this thread again?


I knew when posting this thread originally that nobody would agree with me, and that's fine. I can't say that I really give a shit about the Worms community anymore (no offense, guys), nor have I for many years. If you don't agree with me, that's fine, but never have I encountered a scheme that is played differently in clanners than it is colloquially known to be played in non-clan games.

Lies, I remember I was speaking to you in AG before you made this thread and I told you that 99% of people would not agree with you, you didnt believe me.
If you knew that nobody would agree with you as you say, why bother making the thread knowing full well it would be a complete waste of time and end up making you look stupid!


I still think abusing turn advantage is cowardly and gay, and I'm not changing my mind.

Its not "abusing", its "using".
worm and learn

Re: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners
« Reply #31 on: March 29, 2011, 02:30 PM »
[sarcasm] Yes!! remove telecows and jetpackcow! also remove the teleport on Elite, it's so lame and cheap when you have a situation like this: you with 2 worms (with 45hp and 25hp for example) vs. 2 worms  (with 5hp and 100hp)

45 starts, then it's 5's turn:

455                                                                   25100

and your 45hp worm kills the 5 one

45                                                                      25100

and then you got owned due a tele and pile!!!!

45100                                                                25

45100                                                                25 GIRDER

 100                                                                    25 :(

Damn, how lame and cheap!
[/sarcasm]
« Last Edit: March 29, 2011, 02:33 PM by Twyrfher »


Offline Agneau

Re: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners
« Reply #32 on: March 31, 2011, 08:23 AM »
TOTALLY TRUE REMOVE TELECOW AND REMOVE ROPE IN ROPER AND ROPERACE IT'S JUST USELESS !!!

Offline rU`

Re: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners
« Reply #33 on: March 31, 2011, 08:26 AM »
for real.... f@#! everyone who says telecow which doesnt even exist.. OMG
LaW`T0WER , LoR`T0WER at wwp 2004-2007

TdC`Leroy , cFc`Leroy at w:a 2005-2008

Played leagues: CBC/CBS, FB, XTC, LW, TUS.

Offline Husk

Re: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners
« Reply #34 on: March 31, 2011, 04:27 PM »
If u support telecow u r just retarded! xDDDDddd

Offline Maciej

Re: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners
« Reply #35 on: April 19, 2011, 09:18 PM »
what about 'telecows' in elite and t17? They are so irritating! They destroy whole the tactic! I think they should be forbridden too :-X

man.. If you are going to play hysteria without 'telecows', so maybe just host bng 4v4? ::)

Offline Hussar

Re: rules change request for Hysteria in clanners
« Reply #36 on: May 09, 2011, 06:38 AM »
The answer is simply .........

just put 2 tele only.  :P