Forums
December 18, 2017, 10:33 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - OrangE

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 39
1
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 10, 2016, 04:21 PM »
I don't understand shit when tita posts. but i trust ano so he must be a coglione.

Anyway i'm happy about all the opinions that came out. even if this is not the whole pool of players on tus it's still a good indicator.
For what i've understood the majority of people here is definitely agreeing on "i pick a scheme and you pick a scheme" without stupid arrangements.

I still think this is the best way to go, without being forced to regulate anything else.

Peace everybody

2
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 09, 2016, 05:52 AM »
When u start arguing with Komo its like having a parasite, a tick. He sticks to your ass until the thread is "the Komo show"

I've seen this sooo many times in 8 years. I'm aware I'm giving up this thread to him, officialy, right now, but I couldn't resist. His reply to this post will be probably an insane wall-of-text.

3
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 09, 2016, 04:21 AM »
Orange,do you realize there are hundreds of other players? 4 or 5 people in this thread does not make the majority.

Change happens when enough people want it/ask for it and that's what happened by allowing pre arranged scheme picking it's been a thing for like 5 years or more.

Me and Kaleu are cool, friends disagree on stuff btw ;)

Komo you argue just for the sake of arguing, like always. Stop it, get out of this thread PLEASE.
I just want to hear the opinions of other people and summarize them. Is this a crime? Please go away I don't want to deal with you.

4
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 09, 2016, 03:27 AM »
So for what I've understood so far:

many people agree on the fact that clanners should be played without discussing schemes first.
only few agree on the "ban" system proposed by me, for now.

Anyway it seems like the majority of us is in favour of stopping the "arrangement" behaviour pre-clanners, in a way or another.

For now 2 solutions were proposed:

- Punishing who tries to influence the scheme picking before clanners
- Applying the "ban" system for a trial period of time to see if it gets better.

Other ideas or suggestions are appreciated.

5
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 09, 2016, 03:24 AM »
Komo and Kaleu stop takeovering this thread. If u have unresolved matters go elsewhere pls.

Both of you: you can summarize your opinion in 5 rows and that's it. No flames or I'll get very pissed.

6
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 08, 2016, 11:49 PM »
komo you're against this just because people would ban bng every time vs you.

7
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 08, 2016, 09:24 PM »
Since you can't avoid this behaviour completely, why not regulate it.

Any opinions?

8
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 08, 2016, 02:35 PM »
Ok guys listen let's cut the crap.

There might be a solution for all this. We could do like in all the major tournaments of other games: the ability to ban a scheme.
This means that both teams, before picking their scheme, have the option to ban 1 scheme from the match. This gives interesting strategic options to clans without doing pussy crap and still staying inside strict rules.

I would prefer this instead of arguing and loosing time searching for clanners when people simply won't play certain schemes.
Remember that if you ban the opponent's strongest scheme you won't get a big advantage because of how points work. This could be a valid rule to apply if everybody agrees.

9
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 08, 2016, 02:27 PM »
A free win gives a message like "don't pick this scheme again". You don't want to report a free win more than once and it makes u pick something else. No good. I admit that VoK and I have just clowned around in RR in some occasions, which is like giving a free win. You should play the pick and try your best even if u hate the scheme. You can always do the same to your opponent and pick the scheme that he hates the most. It's up to players whether they want 2 games where either player has no fun or 2 games where both players have fun.

I don't understand picking the opponent's weakest scheme when that means hardly any points and an unbalanced game, though (when u don't need to improve your winning ratio). People just want a worthless win on their record or what? Now Komo says that he enjoys BnG even if his opponent sucks but at least for me there's no fun if there's no real opponent. I don't usually pick my opponent's weakest scheme but a scheme where I'm a slight favorite. I get an exciting game and good points.

wise words #2

10
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 08, 2016, 02:24 PM »
I read you non ropers, this ain't about points, this is about enjoyment or lack of thereof. Right?

So if you can't rope and despise doing so, when your opponent picks it, give him a free win and play your pick. End of the story.

We don't adulterate standings so everyone can enjoy the league in their own magical personal way, that's not how you do things. If people need a specific set of personal rules to have fun in an all around league they need to either adapt or find something else but not expect the rules to mold around their ineptitude.

wise words

11
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 07, 2016, 09:03 PM »
Get some balls, loose some matches and get better. Even after 8 years of sucking.

And trust me, when a clan feels its loosing because some schemes are hard, they will try to get new players or force some inactive friends to come back. We did it, why can't you? (and we even use whatsapp)

12
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 07, 2016, 09:01 PM »
For me it's very simple.

To win the classic league you have to play all schemes in playoffs.
What's the point of playing a league that u can't even think of winning? Not even in 2 years?

Not sure about you but I would hate to be considered an avoider. Cmon people, if you can't even pretend to be tough online what the fuck are you in Real Life? A depressed wet towel?

13
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 07, 2016, 04:06 PM »
In name of DT i say sorry  :( :( :(

hauhauhauha BL ae xD

uhauhaha nino <3

14
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 07, 2016, 03:28 PM »
Learn to play other schemes.

exactly.

15
TUS Discussion / Re: Please explain this to me
« on: June 07, 2016, 03:24 PM »
suggest changes?

Easy change:

Asking for clanners should be made only this way: you ask for clanner or you don't ask for clanner.
Accepting a clanner should be made only this way: either you agree on playing it or you don't.

No conditions for the clanner should be made whatsoever. Every clan that tries to put conditions should be reported and get a penalty.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 39