Forums
May 03, 2024, 11:52 AM

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - chakkman

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 79
31
Leagues General / Re: BAN HYSTERIA FROM DEFAULT LEAGUE
« on: February 11, 2013, 01:56 PM »
Free, i don't know why you are trying so hard to ban this scheme while, especially with your worms promotional thing in mind, it should well be in your interest that there is a scheme which appeals to beginners, as it is easy to learn, hard to master. Also take in your consideration that, as i said, hyst is the most popular scheme since 15 saesons, take it away, and you will also take a way a lot of activity from the classic league, as there will be quite a few people mainly playing it due to the scheme. And the last, most important point is, is that noone will win the classic league based on picking only hysteria. The points system doesn't allow either scheme or noob bashing. So i don't quite see the problem. Not sure about the details of the point system, but i'm quite sure someone who's only good at hysteria and loses anything else will hardly make it into the top 20, if even that. So this system always favours the allround players.

32
Leagues General / Re: BAN HYSTERIA FROM DEFAULT LEAGUE
« on: February 11, 2013, 12:43 PM »
Quote from: Free on February 11, 2013, 12:02 PM
I'm arguing with REASONS, your arguing with just your feelings and opinions.
Quote from: Free on February 09, 2013, 08:41 PM
How the f@#! you guys dont realize that Hyst is the most bullshit scheme default league has ever seen?

We have Aerial, do something about this already. Its not even worth of discussion. Jesus f@#!ing christ.

Worst thing to happen to competitive worming.

Orly?  :D

Well, hyst is the most popular scheme in classic league since 15 seasons. Enough said i think. This league can only benefit from its existence if it also makes beginners play this league. I didn't use to like the scheme in the past too, but then i get more and more tired of the endless change requests, and the never ending "reduce luck in schemes" debates. Can't be that bad anyway if there's still so much activity in this 14 year old game.

33
TUS Discussion / Re: banning schemes
« on: February 10, 2013, 06:27 PM »
But why play classic league then when i can't pick every scheme. :( Banning one each will already be 2 schemes out of 8 excluded.

34
TUS Discussion / Re: banning schemes
« on: February 10, 2013, 06:01 PM »
Quote from: Husk on February 10, 2013, 05:42 PM
would it be good that u and ur opponent could each ban 1 scheme before picking schemes to play? this way there wont be all those topics asking hyst to be removed from classic

That would be against any sense of an overall league, which the classic league is. The discussion about hysteria schemes are almost as old as the scheme itself, there were numerous thread about it in the past, it always turned out that there as many people for keeping the scheme as there are against it.

And personally i think there's nothing worse than people asking for "TUS any1, all schemes except hyst?", or "TUS hyst any1?". Really lame. I want to pick what i want to pick, and not the schemes my opponent is good at.

35
Announcements / Re: W:A v3.7.0.0 Released
« on: February 09, 2013, 06:43 PM »
Quote from: StepS on February 09, 2013, 05:31 PM
your post is certainly untrue: Success

Dude, get back to me when you're able to discuss and explain things in a normal way, your attitude just sucks. :) You're talking about you don't want this thread to be polluted by flaming, and you are doing everything to pollute it.

36
Announcements / Re: W:A v3.7.0.0 Released
« on: February 09, 2013, 05:20 PM »
Well, then the precautions to prevent w:a from being modified are not enough. You can't tell me that there is no way to detect mismatches when w:a gets modified. What you are saying is that anyone could do anything with any game and there is no way to detect it, which is certainly untrue.

37
Announcements / Re: W:A v3.7.0.0 Released
« on: February 09, 2013, 03:15 PM »
Quote from: Tomi on February 09, 2013, 02:06 PM
i  dont want to opne a new topic about this, but is there any solution in 3.6.31 update not to freeze the computer in front-end menu? I downgraded the game and now freezes are back

Why did you downgrade then?

Oh, and to add to the wormkit discussion: I sincerely hope the people who do the updates implement a function to deny to play with people using wormkit in future updates. I don't know if that is possible or not, but the way i see it, with some modules you can do ridiculous stuff, like forcing your opponent to light up to make the game starts, and what not. It can't be really that the game can be tweaked like that, and this isn't in the sense of this league either. Either ban certain modules, making them not work anymore with wormkit, or as i wrote, add a function to be able not to play with people using wormkit.

38
Challenges / Re: TTRR times in league games
« on: February 08, 2013, 03:18 PM »
I see. I couldn't rope with keylock, but it's probably more a matter of getting used to it i guess.

Good job on your progress HHC. Don't get too good, RoH still has to be able to beat TdC. :P

39
Challenges / Re: TTRR times in league games
« on: February 08, 2013, 02:43 PM »
You wanna aim for the best times? I just can talk about myself, but for me that would be pretty frustrating, as i just don't have the skill to do a 38 on such a map e.g. You better aim for something like 45 on most of these maps. There are a few NC maps which are a bit tighter, in the style of AZ01 and Eminef maps, but on most of these i think 44-45 is pretty okaish. Of course, if you want to beat the good guys, you gotta go like 40-42, but then, i guess you just want to improve a bit, so rather aim for something a bit slower. :) Also, if you don't call a good keyboard your own, or remapped your space to a key which allows quick taps, i guess you will be hindered by the hardware pretty much.

40
Off Topic / Re: nokia s60v3 or windows 95 anyone? (trying to play wa on a nokia s60v3 phone)
« on: February 07, 2013, 12:37 PM »
That must have been a very early version of W:A. The latest version already takes over 16 MB when you are just in the menu, and on a normal inter map in a 4vs4 worms it takes 40-50 MB's. Not to talk about big maps which takes a lot more than that…

41
Leagues Complaints / Re: status of asbest
« on: January 31, 2013, 12:46 PM »
Quote from: AsbestMisha on January 31, 2013, 09:11 AM
Quote from: chakkman on January 30, 2013, 08:11 PM
Quote from: AsbestMisha on January 30, 2013, 06:52 PM
I didn't wanted to hack any tus accounts, lol, just was dabbled. It wasn't even possible to hack accounts because I didn't knew passwords xD So, you are just trying to find not exist reasons, because  it was just fun time :) So, I got this 2 months ban just for  that " fun time " I had, Its fair.

Well, if any TUS mod or admin needed a proof that the 2 months ban was completely pointless, here it is.  :D
In fact, the opposite.

Ah, sorry then. I thought you said you had a fun time raping the rules of this site, pissing off its members. I understand that's easily misunderstandable of course.

42
Leagues Complaints / Re: status of asbest
« on: January 30, 2013, 08:11 PM »
Quote from: AsbestMisha on January 30, 2013, 06:52 PM
I didn't wanted to hack any tus accounts, lol, just was dabbled. It wasn't even possible to hack accounts because I didn't knew passwords xD So, you are just trying to find not exist reasons, because  it was just fun time :) So, I got this 2 months ban just for  that " fun time " I had, Its fair.

Well, if any TUS mod or admin needed a proof that the 2 months ban was completely pointless, here it is.  :D

43
Leagues Complaints / Re: status of asbest
« on: January 30, 2013, 06:04 PM »
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on January 30, 2013, 04:27 PM
See I don't really understand this. Is that your way of saying things are wrong? You are a part of TUS, you should be fixing stuff instead of "leaving" threats.

Not really able to do much as a normal user, am i? :( Not sure if it's wrong to complain in this case, crazy says it is, ANO's answer, if meant serious, proves it is. Fact is there's a certain amount of "i can shit all over TUS without the danger of having to face consequences" here, and that's what can be criticized i think. Because users who are only on this site to raise their e-dicks by messing with others user accounts are pretty dispensable. And mostly cases like this are handled like "Let's give him a 2nd and 3rd change to prove he's not that bad of a person". I could be imagining Asbest having pretty much of a laugh at TUS and this discussion now. :)

44
Leagues Complaints / Re: status of asbest
« on: January 30, 2013, 04:14 PM »
Quote from: Crazy on January 30, 2013, 03:54 PM
Did every German wake up in a grumpy mood today? Asbest managing to hack into TUS accounts, yea that's very likely.. I got the email as well, that I wanted to change my password, it was probably the worst attempt ever to get access to any user accounts. 2 months for Asbest to put his head in the freezer should do the job and moreso. How old is he anyway? 15? 16? You'd like to see him hanged instead Chakkman?
Oh yeah, i forgot that a poor try by some kid makes this so much better.  ::) Actually i play and had to deal with with 15 year olds as long as i play this game, and i haven't seen so many try to take over TUS accounts or similar. After all it is a question of character i guess. But ok, i kind of see your point. Just a dumb kid then i guess.

45
Leagues Complaints / Re: status of asbest
« on: January 30, 2013, 03:36 PM »
Quote from: MonkeyIsland on January 30, 2013, 03:15 PM
Asbest was banned for 2 months and his ban got expired.

This is a joke right? That guy tries to take over god knows how many user accounts on TUS, and you give him a 2nd chance? I don't get these sort of "protect the guilty instead of their victims" politics. And honestly, i don't know if i still want to be a member on a site which does nothing to protect its user accounts from being abused. Please think over this again, this is just unjustified.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 79