There is nothing wrong with a t17 scheme that has freeze, nuke, earthquake, select worm, super nana, nana, ming vase, sally, pasty's magic bullet. Superweapons or special weapons or whatever you want to call them are ment to be in a t17 scheme.

why should the game be voided? you quit. Yes its fair to quit a game if someone makes a cow and they will not take a penetly. These situations are clearer.  But if you made the mistake of quitting why should the game be voided when banca had the advantage of going into sd unpoisioned?

When you light you agree to the scheme..

yanme is an experience player and should know freeze is in the scheme.

banca should have the win here because of yanme quitting.

Quote from: L4LoKUl2A on February 26, 2010, 11:12 PM
We got another situation with zippo and company. We were playing an elite with zippo and jerry, we were winning, zippo blamed jerry coz his suckage, in fact he wanted to play with bull but he was away. Suddenly out of the blue zippo crashed, and bull was in ag ready to play, weird isn't it?. Zippo rehosted and bull putted his team, but we refused this and claimed the same teams, coz we suspected that Zippo crashed on purpose, so jerry and bull quitted, they changed nicknames lol and joined once more. Jerry putted his team but wasn't even the same that he used before, we asked him to put his original team but couldn't coz he did not have it, he was bull!

start a new thread lalo on this topic.

whos morgan freeman?! lol
freeman? oh. bor! ahh ha! lol


but i still don't get it. I do like poker and abit of a rounder on pokerstars but im not pro!

Quote from: HHC on February 25, 2010, 05:31 PM


p.s. I hope you guys manage to cleansweep the SB, that's the worst part of the site..

i think removing the SB would be a good thing. It mainly contains flames and anything worthy of a topic avoids getting posted in the forums!

ubers point is you said u were warming with crash  between the two times you used shotbox when these 'loses' were reported against you.

if u have a replay of the warmer with crash then its obvious you did not play these games.

Uber has provided a good case with all those times and details of the games posted and zippo asking for matches in tus shoutbox.

However is that hard evidence?

zippo isnt liked in the community and i know someone that can speak portuguse and also went and caused problems for another person in the community before. But their roping style is no way up to standard of the replays that zippo played.

I think their is too much against zippo in this case.

although the playoffs using the high overall ratings more over seasonal is what caused discontent in FB as people got sick of seeing the same players in the playoffs every season after making the minimal amount of games.

So i think an equal divid between the two is best. It keeps the playoffs fresh. Raising the game limit to 70/80 for a season and then seeing how it goes and reasses the situation after the next playoff selection has occured with the new limits would be my suggestion.

Quote from: MonkeyIsland on February 24, 2010, 03:22 PM
Random00 they meant, the system calculate your seasonal points when reporting, not overall. (along with removing overall from PO)

which we already know is very bad.

I say increasing them game limits is fine. 70 and 50.

If someone gets 70 games in a 45 day season even if they did play in the last week of 10 games a day i still think that active enough. They're still taken part in the season and 70 games for a player with a higher overall rating is a risk for them as they may drop alot of points trying to get those 70 games done. Encouraging the higher ranked players to get more games done to make playoffs is good for the league as it makes it possible for lower ranked players to take some points of the top players (if they win of course)

I think with 70 and 50 we'll have a much nicer section of playoff players.

Now if you want a different suggestion. Take 16 players to the playoffs. 10 of them with top overall, 6 of them with top seasonal. This is slightly different to fb. They had 12 overall and 4 seasonal. The seasonal points was just called something different. Like handicap or something. There standings were always viewed on default of overall points because it being a ladder, the seasonal points was the amount of points a player gained which was the handicap thingy. Its the same as here. A lower ranked new player could gain more points than a higher overall and the top 4 players who gained the most points also made the playoffs.

if zippo claims it was his uncle playing with his team at his uncle's house. Is there anyway of tracing an ip address from the replays? If it is different to zippo's ip address in the games he played previously, vs shui or myself then something fishy prehaps?

But i dont think u can get ip addresses out of replays can you?

we reported twice. sorry
CKC only won 1 bng vs CF

CF then beat CKC in roper.

zippo won 3-2 indeed

nice ttrr draws!

i think a slight adjustment to the games needed is all that is needed. This is a ladder remember and overall points are there for a reason. I dont think pr did anything wrong.

I think people forget the league is a ladder and the importance of overall. I think if the default view of standings was with overall then the newcomers to the site would realise this... then if u wanted to view seasonal you could switch to it like you can do now.

This is a ladder, the league doesnt reset and more focus needs to be drawn to this. People would look at the standings last season and think shaggy was the best player on tus, when infact random00 was.

30 games for an inactive clan is easy over 60 days of season. thats why it should be 50 for clanners.