I know TUS awards are always just for the lulz and are traditionally not so serious but I'd like to know if I am the only one that thinks they could be a little more representing of the best wormers we have in TUS in that year. I often see people get votes that didn't even play a single TUS game or so few that they should not count towards the TUS awards, after all they are awards for the year 2013, not 1999-2013. When people get inactive for 3/4th of the year or even more they shouldn't receive votes at all. For example it would be a lot more motivating for people to work for their points in regular season when at the end they might get rewarded for it by being the best of that year. It could easily be determined by just adding up all seasonal points he/she gained during that year.
Obviously some awards like coolest wormer etc. require a vote but imo TUS awards of individual schemes (elite, rr, bng etc.) and overall best player (all schemes together) could be a lot more representative than they are now.
It would be a great overview who did what great this year and who improved, who was active. Now it's kind of random and saying nothing at all.
Edit: typo!
Obviously some awards like coolest wormer etc. require a vote but imo TUS awards of individual schemes (elite, rr, bng etc.) and overall best player (all schemes together) could be a lot more representative than they are now.
It would be a great overview who did what great this year and who improved, who was active. Now it's kind of random and saying nothing at all.

Edit: typo!