English
Search
Main Menu
Profile
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - TheKomodo

#10831
Quote from: Husk on February 18, 2011, 06:42 AM
its not fake zippo, flori actually had 1000 better rr rating than everyone (=

I see it as impossible to achieve this Rank considering the amount of games he has played and his win % with the current point system, not to mention the fact his Rating is now 2434 now, did he lose 15 games in a row or something? He couldn't have because his worst streak was -4, and his best was only +24.

It just doesn't add up lol.
#10832
Quote from: ZiPpO on February 18, 2011, 06:06 AM
aww wtf...3300 not 2300 ROFLMAO!

aaahahahahha its fake..

tus system fail HAHAHA

That's what I am confused about lol.
#10833
Zippo, IllPwnU has 3387 points there, that's miles ahead of 2300+

When you get to 2200+ you start winning only 20 points per game or something lol
#10834
Seriously MI?

I was thinking maybe the Rating System was different back then allowing you go get so high in points, I would imagine you would need a win % of at least 90% and alot of games played against alot of players with very high ratings to achieve this rating?
#10835
Why exactly do most people want the system changed?

The way I see it, the ELO system is very very effective and accurate where points are concerned, but some people are only bothered by the fact it's  too hard to make the Playoffs because of losing too many points even though your win % is really good, and some people just don't like losing alot of points regardless of Playoffs.

Can't you just change the requirements for reaching Playoffs? Instead of basing it on points, base it on Games played and % alone:

70 games - 65% of games won.

This way, it will be the players who are in best form that will make it to the Playoffs, you might be thinking, what if 20 players or more qualify how can you decide who makes the cut? Easy, just select in order the players who have played the most games with the highest win percentage.

You also might be thinking, what if someone just noob bashes their way to the Playoffs to get a high % of wins, again the answer is quite simple, just pass a rule they must play a variety of good players within their games played for that Season, I think the ea community is responsible and professional enough to decide how to handle that, perhaps even having respected and responsible Players we can trust decide for us and judge, I would chose from SPW, Franz, Random00, Mir, Free, and Mablak, we should be professional enough to implement some form of moderating noob bashers like this, I think a system like this could really be the answer.

I honestly believe it doesn't matter what point system we use, the problem to make Playoffs will always be part of Leagues on WA due to the vast difference of skill levels and good players stuck in the middle or close to the top, but not close enough to qualify with Overall because they keep losing the odd game to players with bad ratings.

People will still want to try and be in the "Top 10" Overall, so winning points is still an important part for Overall, while making Seasonal (basically only for Playoffs anyway) focus on players who actually deserve to be in the Playoffs.

I've been thinking about this idea for a few days now, and I actually think this could be the solution we have all been waiting for.
#10836
Quote from: ZiPpO on February 18, 2011, 04:51 AM
yeah he played not bad in this :P

QUICK!!! Someone call an ambulance i'm having a heart attack !!!
#10837
Gj MagiC :)
#10838
Off Topic / Re: Hai.. HMm
February 18, 2011, 04:48 AM
Did you know you can be permanently banned from Wnet for openly admitting you are using an unofficial version of WA and advising others to obtain it illegally?
#10839
Lol, he tele'd on me just so I wouldn't have 200hp xD

Good game guys, thanks for the laugh, was good fun :)
#10840
Off Topic / Re: Hai.. HMm
February 18, 2011, 03:13 AM
I'll actually support this, but not to download it, I support them to BUY IT and play it, it only costs a few bucks, pretty lame to download WA these days lol, unless you already own a copy and burn it as an iso, that's what I done xD
#10841
b2b / Re: Johnny - Notching explained.
February 18, 2011, 01:04 AM
Johnny, this is the last time I will say this, then I will just ignore you.

I AM NOT COUNTING ANYTHING



Random, Johnny is not absolutely right with that, I am not counting anything, I am not measuring anything, I am not even 100% sure my adjustment will work, if I was to re-aim and then adjust by specifically measuring how much I missed by and then notching the equivilent to how I missed, I would be much more accurate, this is not how I re-aim when I use my thumb, using my thumb is just a fast way for me to get back to where I was so I can quickly think what to do again, if I even want to do something similar again.

Solution 2, second shot, is wrong, at least for me, I play on a 42"HDTV on 1152*864, I can clearly see where my angle was because when I move it, the only way I can explain it is looks like it just sort of "clicks" into place, I don't even need to use my thumb, I just do that to save time if I am in a rush.

Taking into consideration the opponent doesn't have land above them, I can hit 100% with notching, Just keep doing 4s full power grenades, You can also do this with a few other shots at full power, so it's impossible to miss because you just hold space until the pwoer bar reaches full and automatically releases, and tele to where the angle changes when the worms move slightly, this is how I used to play, and it's just stupid let alone lame.

My final thought:

I eventually got as good as I am at BnG by instinct, by just practising and experimenting over and over again offline alot as well as online, I played countless BnG's with Bamf, Bud, dw33b and others, I used to play literally over 200 BnG's a week at least, I can do all basic shots 1st time with a very high success rate, Random, just remember our TuS BnG recently, I didn't use my thumb to re-aim that entire game, I didn't even get a chance to lol, I pull off trick shots and very hard shots 1st time alot also, and even after all this, most of the time when I do miss, I don't even use my thumb as much as you may think, I actually rarely do it because I am so accurate and consistent with 1st hits and also just because my ridiculously huge HDTV is so crystal clear, I can tell I had the same aim without doing it anyway.

This thread is now being locked.


#10842
What the heck, I stumbled across this game by luck and see Flori had a TTRR rating of 3387, how did he get that high? And howcome he's so low now?
#10843
b2b / Re: Johnny - Notching explained.
February 18, 2011, 12:15 AM
You can judge notching "to the fullness" if you actually know what is is, how to do it, and I mean how to do it properly, you would see the difference.

I don't need to think because it's obvious to me how I need to adjust the shot, this has nothing to do with "notching" not even in the slightest, it has nothing to do with intentions or unintentional, the simple fact is I am that good at BnG I can re-aim with or without my thumb to the exact same spot or where I want to be just because I know how that angle looks, I use my thumb because it's faster and less hassle.

It shouldn't even matter how I re-aim because I hit so many shots 1st time and I have proven more than enough times in the past how good I can shoot with instinctive aiming.

I stopped notching because it was so easy Ramone, I went from an average player to practically unbeatable in less than a week, how the hell is that fair?

#10844
General discussion / Re: Showcase 3!
February 18, 2011, 12:03 AM
Zippo, you are only allowed 30s in the video.
#10845
b2b / Re: Johnny - Notching explained.
February 17, 2011, 11:47 PM
Do you know what counting means Johnny?

It means "1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, etc"

Me moving my aim, without thinking, is not counting is it? I am looking at the difference and moves and feel if it's acceptable or not.

You cannot win this arguement lol.