Also, for the people who haven't tried the scheme, i'm sure alot of them watched the replays you and ShyGuy uploaded, and seeing as you are the experts on this, then surely watching that is all they need to know to learn the "tactics etc"...

Thank you very much Cue, I will try this tomorrow

 I ain't uploading shit, I ain't doing it cuz you told me to...

You have known me long enough to know that I don't lie so think what you want...

You only have to play the scheme 2-3 times to understand it, seeing as I am a very experienced roper also, I have played this game since the start, I already have FULL KNOWLEDGE of every possible thing you can do with the rope in this type of scheme, so taking away 3 seconds of turntime, 5 seconds of retreat time, and the choice to collect crate or not, does not take a rocket scientist to put 2 and 2 together.

End of story, I ain't getting involved in this anymore (the arguing)

I have my opinion, you have yours, lets leave it at that shall we?

And actually, if anything w2Roper is easier, because you DO NOT have to collect the crate before you can attack, so technically, if you get your 1st 4-5 crates, and hit all those shots, and opponent misses 1-2, you can just finish them off without collecting all the crates, some strategy...

Only thing that makes it harder is having 12s, which is kind of cancelled out with the no crate rule factor.

Where did I say w2Roper has no strategy?

"when to use FD? my only thought is whenever and as much as u possible can.."

This same thing goes to your crate rule, collect it and attack whenever and as much as possible...

And I don't see why hiding on top is considered lame, it IS a strategy that undoubtly works, without fail (unless you fail)

You should be good enough to keep up with the other player so that they don't get the advantage to do this anyway.

It's not in my opinion, honestly.

Read the other thread cuz i'm fed up telling you that I HAVE PLAYED THE DAMN SCHEME ! lol

Actually I am interested in this also:

How do you make movies with worms replays? Like put together some nice shots etc?

Oh, and for the last time:

I HAVE TRIED YOUR SCHEME ALREADY - AND LIKE IT ! JUST NOT AS MUCH AS NORMAL ROPER.

Lol...

Of course normal Roper has strategy, more so in 2on2 obviously, but still has strategy, w2Roper doesn't exactly have much strategy either in that case, just a decision to make, "Am I good enough to get that crate and hit, or not?"

There are strategies for both.

For example, hiding, on top or under, when to use FD, when to use a grenade and keep the player in the same spot, or push him somewhere to stop him getting out as easy - LOTS of little strategies actually

[ShyGuy*mm] man he sounds more mixed up than a milkshake

Lol nice one +1

I'm pretty impressed with that lalo

"Things should be done in a natural way, if there were a lot of people hosting and playing w2 roper this scheme should be added, but being honest the only ones I've seen hosting it is Avi, Shy, Dulek and no one else. The rest of the classic schemes are quite popular, everyone can see shoppers hosted all day long by noobs, average and well known players; but I'm pretty sure than no one apart from this league know that this kind of roper does even exist."

I couldn't agree more with this.

And lol, w2BnG LOL ! NEVER !

I'd be happy with NrBnG if it was a different scheme...

Quote from: Chicken23 on August 25, 2010, 07:21 AM
If they refused to play w2roper. Classic would of had to been played.

I know, but do you understand my point?

The point is, they are 2 different schemes, so why 2 schemes = 1 set of points?

Should be 2 different schemes...

This is regarding game #37032 mm Vs cfc

We lost 52 points for this game, it was a w2Roper, before I continue my clanmates played the game I didn't so they must have obviously accepted this, I can accept them losing, but this is what bothers me, even if we had won, we would gain less points.

w2Roper is NOT the same as a normal Roper, there is different tactics and gameplay altogether, so why should we lose points for a different scheme from a scheme we gained alot of points with?

w2Roper should be a seperate scheme, just like Shopper and WxW, as they are the same concept, with different rules as well.

Who else agrees?

And before avi comes on here moaning at me, even if this wasn't my clan, or we had won the game I would still be posting this.

And how the hell is it fair to lose alot of points cfc have took alot of time building up, to something that isn't even the same scheme??

avi/shyguy have practised this scheme, we haven't in fact, most of wnet haven't, if anything w2Roper should be a new scheme altogether, instead of losing Roper points for a w2Roper...


IT IS NOT THE SAME SCHEME !