why? if someone is good in one scheme and he really likes it, it gives him fun it's ok. Why should it be forbridden?
And who talks it? Komo? Guy whoes only pick is bng?

Only pick is BnG? What world are you living in LOL, most of my games for Q are other picks.

Guess you numpties should do your research before failing all the time

And before when I played Singles, I made PO but I checked the box so I didn't take part in them, because imo I didn't deserve it, because I only wanted to play BnG competitively and there was nowhere else for me to do this lol.


But either way is fine with me, I don't care if people abuse schemes like this cuz they will get owned in PO anyway and it doesn't affect me lol.

Who cares about clanners?

Your only pick was bng, you even spammed AG in looking for tus bng.

Check your stats.

Quote from: Maciej on March 07, 2013, 05:26 PM
Who cares about clanners?

Your only pick was bng, you even spammed AG in looking for tus bng.

Check your stats.

Did you not read what I just said? I didn't participate in PO... I played just BnG because that's all I wanted, other people clearly avoid, and I always put my best effort into other players pick.

if you gained PO you should participate in them, you didn't steal these points but fairly won

I know there are players like chelsea who look for tus only by pm spamming newbies, but you can't change this, they will never win PO anyway.

Maciej, it would be completely lame if I done that, it's an Overall League and I only wanted to parcipate in the BnG Standings, in fact, the only reason I started playing TuS League was to see how fast I could get to #1 for BnG, which was under 48 or 72 hours I think lol, maybe it was 4 days? Who cares anyway lol.

Because I had so many points some people would try to pick BnG against me because in 2 games total they would lose less than 10 points if they lose, so 60-70% of all my games are BnG.

So if there was a guy who played all schemes evenly, and would make PO if I don't participate, then I won't particpate, it's only fair I reckon.

for me it's not problem which way you get PO, as long as it's fair way, and your was. But if you feel this like that.

what about 'overall player' whoes opponents are mostly guess guys? That's still fair way, but real lame...

What's with this new trend of brainstorming?

Don't think there's much to change tbh.

o cool, more opportunity for komo to tell us how great he is in bng

please komo tell us more!

LOL I knew you'd bite avi !

I remembered you said something about me always talking about BnG so thought i'd put that in there especially for you babe !

Quote from: GreatProfe on February 10, 2013, 05:50 PM
i guess make deals b4 the games start is always the best way to play a tus single.

True words.

-

The idea of banning 1 scheme isn't good. It just helps noobish avoiders who try to get more points without being an allrounder. Pointwhores are lame and the avoiders car isn't big enough for so many haters who lost the fun already and mainly play for points and not for fun.

-

And real pro people would pick the schemes where the opponent is high ranked anyway, because it is a much more interesting game and they would get much more points for the victory.

-

So my idea is, just don't play vs lamers who try bad noobbashing or practise all schemes

-

For clanners I can say that the clanner points should be calculated via the people who play and not via the clanrank in a scheme. I remember the avoiding where noobs in bad clans weren't allowed to play because it would cost too much - for that wanna be pro clans ...

and that's sad.

-

I think the people should be intelligent enough to arrange games where everybody can have fun!

-

You could even ask for special tus games, like sx mario who keeps asking for tus bng.

Then you get that games which you want and all is good.

Quote from: Husk on February 10, 2013, 05:42 PM
would it be good that u and ur opponent could each ban 1 scheme before picking schemes to play? this way there wont be all those topics asking hyst to be removed from classic

what happened if ur oponent wants 3 rrtt for example and u agreed too? D:

they wouldn't ban rr then =D if they both wanted to play it

yeah komo, im sure....




dennis, i agree about the clanners...  i dont know if its possible to code that, im sure there is a way.. but it would make sense to have points calculated by the team your playing...  a clan should not win as much points vs me and nino and a ttrr, as they should win vs sirj and statik.

thats been an issue i been thinking about for a while... 

after all, there is an option to analyze with specific players of a clan, but the points stay the same no matter what...      this should be fixed...


ok komo, now come here and disagree, and tell us how good you are

Dude, I am right, you are wrong, I am just awesome, ken...