Your words do not make much sense. There is a significant language barrier here; perhaps that's why you've failed to understand so much that I have said, and perhaps there are some things you've tried to say which I've failed to understand. It might be better if you replied in your native language, and I ran it through Google Translator to try to figure out what you really meant, further using a dictionary and manual translation if there's ambiguity. (I mean that in full seriousness.)
Everyone who plays here knows the usual rules. Of course, there are exceptions in the form of newbies, but that's a different matter.
I just explained why that's a terrible system. It's much better to eliminate all the ambiguity. And the game
makes that possible now. There's no excuse not to use this feature.
It makes no sense to discuss the merits of the versions of the schemes for one simple reason - the draw took place.
The... "draw"? What do you mean?
Your mistake is that you did not offer your option in advance. That's all.
I gave SIBASA the choice of whether to agree with the scheme or not. And I honestly didn't expect him to be so opposed to the idea. Nevertheless he was free to choose, and he chose to agree to it.
And the fact that the schemes are signed the same is not only mine. More than 10 types of schemes are signed in the same way.
"Signed"? What are you talking about here? I'm not sure I understand. But if you mean a scheme attached to a cup or tournament, I already explained I did not know about it when I signed up, and only found out when my match with Syc was about to start. So how does this have any relevance to the issue at hand?
In your case, it is worth proposing the scheme as a substitute in the league. I did not support your option for one good reason - because I studied the probability of weapon dropping and found it out of balance. In the league scheme, the bow also has 50 damage per shot.
Truly I wouldn't mind much if you took my scheme, and changed its weapon probabilities to suit your liking. That is the thing I care
least about. Have you read anything I've written? I've made it clear again and again what I most dislike in your scheme, and it's not the crate probabilities.
Heck, if I'd have known you cared so much about crate probabilities, I would have copied your crate probabilities into my scheme myself before playing the cup games with Syc and SIBASA.
Glitches can be conditionally prohibited, as they did before.
"Conditionally prohibited"? Huh? As "they" did? Who's they? I haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about. Language barrier...
The increased damage from digging tools only confuses players who are used to the old damage indicators.
You're... making my own point for me. The increased damage of digging tools in
your scheme is completely different from what I've been accustomed to for 20 years.
I never should have posted the WormNET #Team17League scheme translated from WormNET protocol into a .WSC file. Back when I did it, I meant it to be only for historical interest and academic reasons. I didn't mean for people to
use that scheme. Before I posted that, everybody played T17 with blowtorch and drill set to 3 stars of power. Ever since then, it seems people have treated the #Team17League scheme as being sacred and have stuck with its bad settings. Which makes no sense whatsoever, because as far as I've heard, the Team17 scheme underwent many changes while the WormNET leagues were still up. The one posted is only the final form it was in before the leagues were taken offline in 2000. (And I can only know about that secondhand, as I started playing Worms Armageddon in October 2000, and started playing on WormNET about a month later, so by the time I came on the scene, the leagues were already down.)
If I am not convinced in my words,
You're not sure if you're convinced by your own words? Language barrier.
you can simply say that it is necessary to innovate in the league or cup games in a timely manner, and not create a mess by provoking conflicts
"Provoking conflicts"? I tried as hard as I possibly could (short of playing with your scheme, which was never an option) to
not provoke anything. SIBASA was not on the same page, and chose to turn this into a fully provoked conflict.