Try to get 50 + wins in tus hysteria by simply playing against whoever wants to play with you in AG..Just like you did when you got that winning streak on BnG.. If you can get 50 wins in a row that way then hysteria is indeed not a scheme dependant on luck (Eventhough it will still be a horribly agonizing experience)
If you can not get 50 + wins ? Then hysteria is not as luckless as you claim......And should be bannished to a seperate leauge..
What do you mean with balance anyways ? I know that hysteria needs to go in order to improve the skill required to prevail in the leauge...I would also think ressurecting intermidiate/luckless back while getting rid of shoppa is a good idea..
Doubletime, I could easily avoid the top Hysteria players and have a good chance of winning 100/100 games, i'd definitely reach at least 90% without doubt, and that's even being rusty at the scheme.
darKz, Dota 2 has many many more players am I right? WA with such a small community, let's say, 200-500 active players, with only a handful who could beat the rest of wnet with 80%+ win ratio for their specialized schemes, except each other where the outcome is closer to 70%/60%/50%.
If we could force all participants to play each other a strict number of games, balanced with every scheme, then, and ONLY then, would this League be fair in a truly "competitive" way.
Until then, there isn't a valid enough reason to complain about Hysteria, or any other scheme, under the reason of "not being truly competitive", every single scheme has flaws, whether they are scheme flaws, difference of the technology used to play WA, to the unique abilities and intelligence of the Humans playing the game.