Forums
June 08, 2024, 08:29 AM

Author Topic: Changing Classic League Schemes  (Read 25136 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Gabriel

  • Slacker is a queefer
  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • Chile Chile
  • UC UC clan

  • Posts: 1,117
  • Might come back later idk
    • View Profile
Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #45 on: July 04, 2012, 10:15 PM »
darKz,
Gabriel is one of the best Hysteria players, true. But he has so much passion for winning that losing in Hysteria makes him get fed up. Besides did I miss him being here saying Hysteria is flawed? you mean this one "Hysteria sux ;D" ?


Thats why maybe u havent seen me playing hyst for leagues but trl...
That scheme was just killing me...
By the way i think hyst is a funner-made scheme. I dont think who made it had the intention or purpose to get it into a league.
Hyst is ofc a scheme that has a lot of fails... teleports shouldnt have ever been unlimited.
Aerial fixed that great point that imo changes the whole scheme.
Aerial is a new scheme, I like it more than hyst (I hate it, it personally killed even my personal life sometimes) and screws up the most of lame moves that so much complainings have gotten.
I am doing a comparison, may be really pathetic as peja would say but lameness in hyst, is done everywhere, I get telecowed even in elite  :P ;D
Well, as I said hyst should be a fun scheme for funners... We already screwed it up with these all things and telecows and blablablablaba.
Theres lamers everywhere, but they only can lame if you let them lame.

PD: I suck at it
Mole shopper is the worst thing in the world.

Offline TheKomodo

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #46 on: July 05, 2012, 08:33 AM »
the same player who supports the fact that the worse player can win a ttrr, is now crying about "undeserved wins" in other schemes?

I was thinking this too lol, alot of these guys were only last week screaming and almost crying in the RR ms thread, saying "PLEASE, PLEASE MR MONKEYISLAND, PLEASE DON'T TAKE AWAY OUR FUN DRAWS!!! OH WHAT WILL WE DO IF WE LOSE, BECAUSE WE LOST, WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO WIN IF WE LOST, LIKE SPARTACUS!"

Yet, they want to take away, the most commonly fun scheme on TuS, and one of the most fun, easy to play and entertaining, not to mention one of the most competitive schemes WA has ever had if you have the skill level of players like me and Random for example competing against each other, you can't bash the scheme just because most of it's players aren't as good as the few really top players it has, if the whole world played WA, Hyst would be #1 and you would all shut the fk up.

Once you realise, a win is a win, a loss is a loss, the knowledge of what needs to be done, how to do it and when it needs to be done, makes this a great scheme in the right hands and in the right minds, actually one of the least lucky schemes i've ever played, and i've been playing WA since 1999, and I am RIDICULOUSLY competitive.

The way TuS is now, and always will be better than the way any of you guys would run it if you had the chance, I really don't know how MI has managed to do this for so long, with this much drama on a daily basis, it's impressive, no, it's miraculous.

I see so many people asking for things they would soon forget about and get bored if it actually happened. They will ALWAYS find something to complain about, not because they are unhappy with TUS, but because they are unhappy with their lifes.

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #47 on: July 05, 2012, 08:54 AM »
my thoughts:

hysteria is about micromanagement(?).  I don't even know if that is the right word... but you have 1 second to do a move, you need to be quick with your fingers, it's fast, it is intense.  I think that's the theme of hysteria, hence the name.  The problem is, the duration of time to make a move (1 sec) is too short and is abused.  You can rotate rape someone because in 1 second, it is very hard to properly defend your other worms, etc.  The concept of hysteria is a great one, but because of the turn time, the game is broken.  Here we have an artillery, destructible, gritty combat scheme where getting the shit blown out of you all game means absolutely nothing because you can abuse the scheme.  We've had this discussion before; there's no risk in hysteria, tactics are piss poor because nothing matters until it is 1v1.  Early and mid game are absolutely pointless.  This is very bad for this kind of scheme.  I like to call late game "luckyshotgg" time.  A lot will probably disagree with this viewpoint, but when it is 1v1 and you're teleporting all over the map and you only have 1 second to aim these shots, then yeah, it's luckyshotgg, unless you're someone like komo, and we already have a scheme that purely rewards on nade accuracy... I mean when you have 1 second to make a move, you can barely your worm, you can't set up your shot, you just have to take it, and when your nade does 5 crazy ass bounces and somehow hits me, I'm not going to consider that skill.

With all that being said, Aerial far better rewards micromanagement skills.  With 3 seconds, you can travel fairly far with the jetpack, you can land somewhere, use a weapon, etc.  You cover more ground and anyone who thinks they can kill their own worm to rotate is sadly mistaken.  With 3 seconds, it is doable (with skill) to jp to a worm, land, and firepunch the enemy right off your ally.  With 3 seconds, you can thwart your darksiding opponent because you have enough time to float down to him and try to f@#! him up.  There's risk and there are far more tactics.  More jetpack skills, just more options for more things, and 3 seconds (still a short time, a lot of hysteria with fingers pressing keys fast and stuff) allows you to do a lot more things than you could ever do in hysteria.  It's not a broken scheme in that regard like hysteria is.  Hysteria is so limiting and people abuse that which creates a poor competitive scheme.

HOWEVER - do some of you seriously want to add aerial in the league right now as it is? holy shit, I thought the opposition against precise times in ttrr was the saddest moment in this "competitive" league.
What a poor decision that would be.  a scheme with random placing, random mines, random mine fuses, random weapons crate drops, random utility crate drops, random health crate drops, and god knows what you'll get in those utility and weapon crates.  You call that league worthy?  You don't even have to play the scheme once to know how awful that sounds for a competitive league scheme.  I've gotten supersheeps in crates before, airstrikes, homing missiles, etc, which is pretty much instant win if you don't play like a complete derp the entire game.  You start with 5 girders and 1 teleport which can get abused so hard.  

I've lost a game before when my opponent got a random crate drop early in the game, 15 minutes later, I get point-clicked airstriked for the loss.  I mean if you can get a supersheep in a random crate, as soon as you have 1 worm I guess it's time to run for the hills and darkside or else you simply lose because they got a broken weapon.  And it doesn't even matter how well you played all game - nothing will change the fact that your opponent got a lucky SS/airstrike crate and brainlessly won.  That's my problem with t17 - it's so silly to lose a game even tho you played so much better than your opponent just because he point-clicked patsy'd you.  The same thing can happen in aerial.


MI has a good point there. At the moment we have a good mix of luck and competition.
We just dont have enough people here to take away more luck. If you do this, games will get boring very fast and the number of avoiding problems will increase.
There are simply not enough players that have approximately the same skill level in every scheme.

Man, it's statements like these that keep preventing change in the league, and it blows my mind how statements like these are so easily accepted despite the lack of actual evidence and argumentation.  How do you know games will get boring very fast when we've never actually made these changes to the league?  How do you know avoiding problems will increase when we've never actually made these changes to the league? Why does your last sentence even matter?  Other gaming leagues don't nurture their noobs with luck, people just play and get better because they like the game.  And can we all stop acting like removing firepunch from shoppa is going to cause catastrophic changes to the scheme and scare everyone away?  Back to your "avoiding problems will increase" statement, do you actually believe using precise times in ttrr will be the difference between one player/clan playing another player/clan?  You say avoiding will increase, are you trying to say right now some people aren't avoiding because they feel comfortable playing schemes knowing luck may give them a chance to win?  If so, is that the kind of thing we want for a COMPETITIVE league?  That contradicts the idea behind a competitive league, think about it.  We keep enforcing these policies that preserve the luck, the fun, the shit that keeps noobs playing, all while pretending like this is a competitive league.  I don't understand the thought process.  Like, it's amazing that people still settle for the zook-first-turn rule in roper - you're forced to use the zook, a weapon affected by the random wind generator, and with roper maps traditionally having odd shaped hides, you could easily be denied an attack first turn.  What happens when someone proposes to fix such a scheme flaw?  The same people come out of the woodwork to throw around buzzwords and phrases like "fun", "luck", "the scheme will become boring", "this will lead to avoiding", "we'll lose players" etc...  PROVE IT!!!!!!  STOP TALKING OUT OF YOUR ASSES!!!!  

I know you guys hate Komo-long posts, but come on, it's time to wake up.  Some of us are compelled to write out big-ass posts explicitly arguing our side rather than posting a couple sentences of subjective bullshit like "you're taking the fun out of the schemes".  If you'd actually give these changes a try, I'm willing to bet things wouldn't take a drastic turn of events like you fear.  If you're really going to stop playing the league because the faster roperacers will actually get awarded the win, then good, get the f@#! out. (this post wasn't directed towards anyone particular, but definitely directed towards a certain mentality)
  <-- my brain when I clan with avi

Offline darKz

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #48 on: July 05, 2012, 08:57 AM »
So I actually bothered to read your post.

Yet, they want to take away, the most commonly fun scheme on TuS, and one of the most fun, easy to play and entertaining, not to mention one of the most competitive schemes WA has ever had if you have the skill level of players like me and Random for example competing against each other, you can't bash the scheme just because most of it's players aren't as good as the few really top players it has, if the whole world played WA, Hyst would be #1 and you would all shut the fk up.
Dude you sound like a MASSIVE fanboy.
If you really want to win Hyst you'll be teleporting around to places where you can't be hit until your opponent gets bored and stays in a stupid hide just to get a shot which he'll 99% miss or enforces SD where it becomes a gamble (the one enforcing SD is not always the one at advantage) - Hysteria can take 1h+ in this way, I've seen it all... If by now you still don't get what's f@#!ed up with the scheme, forget it, you probably don't want to see it.

Once you realise, a win is a win, a loss is a loss, the knowledge of what needs to be done, how to do it and when it needs to be done, makes this a great scheme in the right hands and in the right minds, actually one of the least lucky schemes i've ever played, and i've been playing WA since 1999, and I am RIDICULOUSLY competitive.
I don't think you have deeper insight into "Hysteria tactics" than anyone else here. If you do, I'd like to see some of your awesome plays please.

I see so many people asking for things they would soon forget about and get bored if it actually happened. They will ALWAYS find something to complain about, not because they are unhappy with TUS, but because they are unhappy with their lifes.
How come that most of the time you try to underline your statement with a ridiculously childish claim at the end? xD!
I remember knowing who it was but dont remember exactly what I knew
~ Dubc 2010

Offline TheKomodo

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #49 on: July 05, 2012, 09:07 AM »
Dude you sound like a MASSIVE fanboy.
If you really want to win Hyst you'll be teleporting around to places where you can't be hit until your opponent gets bored and stays in a stupid hide just to get a shot which he'll 99% miss or enforces SD where it becomes a gamble (the one enforcing SD is not always the one at advantage) - Hysteria can take 1h+ in this way, I've seen it all... If by now you still don't get what's f@#!ed up with the scheme, forget it, you probably don't want to see it.

You are wrong immediately because you are taking time into account, if you truly enjoy something, it doesn't matter how long it takes, it's worth it.


Once you realise, a win is a win, a loss is a loss, the knowledge of what needs to be done, how to do it and when it needs to be done, makes this a great scheme in the right hands and in the right minds, actually one of the least lucky schemes i've ever played, and i've been playing WA since 1999, and I am RIDICULOUSLY competitive.
I don't think you have deeper insight into "Hysteria tactics" than anyone else here. If you do, I'd like to see some of your awesome plays please.

I am way better at BnG than you, this is my ONLY secret weapon, and the occasional "idea" of risky shots only I would think of lol.

You spent as much time with grenades and zooks as I have, and you could be as good.

I am just a genius at BnG, just like Ronnie O Sullivan @ Snooker, of course snooker is WAAAAAAAAAY harder, I only say this cuz you can't notch snooker lol.

This sounds egotistical as hell man lol, but it's my only real proof of why Hysteria is competitive... Everyone I know who says it sucks, isn't good enough to get past the frustrations of the lame parts about it. There is lame things about EVERY scheme ever.

I think you all jealous cuz a scheme you all can't "perfect" is the most popular in TUS lol, while your precious Elite & TTRR doesn't even come close to it haha.

I see so many people asking for things they would soon forget about and get bored if it actually happened. They will ALWAYS find something to complain about, not because they are unhappy with TUS, but because they are unhappy with their lifes.
How come that most of the time you try to underline your statement with a ridiculously childish claim at the end? xD!

Cuz I honestly believe it lol. I know cuz i've been there, I f@#!ed up with some of my mates in b2b (among other things in life) cuz I had a shitty life last year, but this year is better cuz all the hard work I put in.


Offline Desetroyah

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #50 on: July 05, 2012, 09:16 AM »
They will ALWAYS find something to complain about, not because they are unhappy with TUS, but because they are unhappy with their lifes.

Thats a slippery slope there Komo. Its like saying "everything is relevant", you can "win"/bypass all arguments in life like this :P

Saying, "you simply say this cuz your life sucks", is the equivalent of, "fu and gtfo", its mere insulting and doesn't at all address the issues at hand.

As for Hyst as  a scheme, I dislike it, I believe it is the most broken scheme, the 2nd most easily abused (bng wins this as you all know), but I simply dont care enough about it anymore. I doubt that not caring is a good thing but this is what has happened after so many arguments on the subject.


Offline Aerox

  • ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥
  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • Spain Spain
  • KH KH clan

  • Posts: 2,133
  • :::::::::::::::::::::
    • View Profile
Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #51 on: July 05, 2012, 09:19 AM »
I am way better at BnG than you
Quote
You spent as much time with grenades and zooks as I have, and you could be as good.
Quote
I am just a genius at BnG
Quote
Everyone I know who says it sucks, isn't good enough
Quote
I think you all jealous

my god drop the anti depressants
« Last Edit: July 05, 2012, 09:21 AM by ropa »
MonkeyIsland, my friend, I know your english is terrible and your understanding of society limited. However, in real life, people attack and humiliate others without the use of a single bad word. They even go to war with lengthy politeness. You can't base the whole moderation philosophy of a community based on the use of bad words and your struggle with sarcasm and irony. My attack to Jonno was fully justified and of proper good taste.
Eat a bag full of dicks.

Offline TheKomodo

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #52 on: July 05, 2012, 09:24 AM »
Dese, it's partly true lol, I know alot of people on WA in a close way, I know some of these guys are having tough times, it's just a way of life, people who are generally unhappy, will complain about something in whatever they are involved in...

ropa, who cares what anyone thinks, it's the truth, boo hoo hoo, cry me a river lol, if they are bothered, then they should get better, I shouldn't have to get worse, or be forced to play schemes that have too much f@#!ing luck that I can't control, and because I can't control it I can't enjoy it, because there is too much luck.

I said they are jealous that Hyst is better than Elite/TTRR, not because of my BnG, I don't ruin threads, the truth does, I am just the guy who wants to tell it.

ropa you've edited that 3 times now wtf, make up your mind lol.

Offline Aerox

  • ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥
  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • Spain Spain
  • KH KH clan

  • Posts: 2,133
  • :::::::::::::::::::::
    • View Profile
Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #53 on: July 05, 2012, 09:29 AM »
Dese, it's partly true lol, I know alot of people on WA in a close way, I know some of these guys are having tough times, it's just a way of life, people who are generally unhappy, will complain about something in whatever they are involved in...

Yes, everyone who argues with logic about hysteria being an awful league scheme are just sad people in real life.

I think you're the only one with real issues here, and I'm not even joking. I see evidence everywhere of you suffering NPD. Please do consult an specialist, for your own good, and the forum's.

Bye
MonkeyIsland, my friend, I know your english is terrible and your understanding of society limited. However, in real life, people attack and humiliate others without the use of a single bad word. They even go to war with lengthy politeness. You can't base the whole moderation philosophy of a community based on the use of bad words and your struggle with sarcasm and irony. My attack to Jonno was fully justified and of proper good taste.
Eat a bag full of dicks.

Offline Desetroyah

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #54 on: July 05, 2012, 09:31 AM »
Dese, it's partly true lol, I know alot of people on WA in a close way, I know some of these guys are having tough times, it's just a way of life, people who are generally unhappy, will complain about something in whatever they are involved in...

The fact that it's true still doesn't change the fact that the matters/issues we're discussing remain not addressed.


I don't ruin threads, the truth does

To be honest, this quote is just ridiculous xd

I am just the guy who wants to tell it.

you sir, are one badass crusader xd



Offline TheKomodo

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #55 on: July 05, 2012, 09:40 AM »
Lmfao Dese, nice pic xD

And just lol @ ropa.

Offline darKz

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #56 on: July 05, 2012, 09:59 AM »
You are wrong immediately because you are taking time into account, if you truly enjoy something, it doesn't matter how long it takes, it's worth it.
I don't enjoy teleporting around for 30+ minutes just for the sake of my opponent getting bored. Do you?

I am way better at BnG than you, this is my ONLY secret weapon, and the occasional "idea" of risky shots only I would think of lol.

You spent as much time with grenades and zooks as I have, and you could be as good.
Yeah yeah, you're great at BnG and all that, but to be honest I knew this would be your answer so it's not surprising.. Let me sum this up. I've asked you what your special tactics are because you said you knew what to do and when to do it, you said you're on par with Random, and all you were talking about was the BnG part of Hysteria. Made a good point there I must say.

Drop the childish act already, you're not even talking about facts besides "how awesome you are".. Leave that to fictional characters like Barney Stinson..

I've made tons of good points why Hysteria in itself is flawed, others also have, you don't even answer to those points, you just say "I'm awesome at BnG, you're all jealous because that means I pwn Hysteria LOL". That's not even what this thread is about.
I remember knowing who it was but dont remember exactly what I knew
~ Dubc 2010

Offline Aerox

  • ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥
  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • Spain Spain
  • KH KH clan

  • Posts: 2,133
  • :::::::::::::::::::::
    • View Profile
Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #57 on: July 05, 2012, 10:18 AM »
Couple of weeks ago I was in #ag playing with Komo and he suggested we clanned but I was rusty as f@#!.

So he suggested we played hysteria because
MonkeyIsland, my friend, I know your english is terrible and your understanding of society limited. However, in real life, people attack and humiliate others without the use of a single bad word. They even go to war with lengthy politeness. You can't base the whole moderation philosophy of a community based on the use of bad words and your struggle with sarcasm and irony. My attack to Jonno was fully justified and of proper good taste.
Eat a bag full of dicks.

Offline TheKomodo

Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #58 on: July 05, 2012, 10:19 AM »
Because you still have good BnG skills and you are good enough at Hysteria that with me carrying you, we can win, it's like, when I do TTRR with daina, or Elite/T17 with daina, she carries me lol, I am good enough for her to do the job xD

Offline Aerox

  • ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥
  • Hero Member
  • *****

  • Spain Spain
  • KH KH clan

  • Posts: 2,133
  • :::::::::::::::::::::
    • View Profile
Re: Changing Classic League Schemes
« Reply #59 on: July 05, 2012, 10:24 AM »
Because you still have good BnG skills and you are good enough at Hysteria that with me carrying you, we can win, it's like, when I do TTRR with daina, or Elite/T17 with daina, she carries me lol, I am good enough for her to do the job xD

No one carries anyone in TTRR, one good time doesn't beat two good times. In Elite, to an extent, certainly not as much as hysteria. Team17, I don't know, haven't played 2v2 t17 in a decade. Point is, we decided hysteria was the scheme we had more chances to win even with a super rusty me, because ultimately, it's the biggest gamble. It's the new scheme noobs pick to beat pros. Used to be team17.
MonkeyIsland, my friend, I know your english is terrible and your understanding of society limited. However, in real life, people attack and humiliate others without the use of a single bad word. They even go to war with lengthy politeness. You can't base the whole moderation philosophy of a community based on the use of bad words and your struggle with sarcasm and irony. My attack to Jonno was fully justified and of proper good taste.
Eat a bag full of dicks.