New Roper !!!!!!!

[avirex]

The roper scheme is just sooooo classic, but *tear* I do support these ideas

[Guaton]

no , ty xD

i like rope as it is ...

...and if I would have to choose a change for the scheme necessarily , i would go for shyguy/avirex w2roper XDDD

[darKz]

No rules Roper, if anything.

[Agneau]

This rule sucks just for one reason:

If you lead, you just have to hide top or hide really near from a wall and do w2w all the time.
on this way, it is impossible for the other guy to win.
It will just become a boring schem without any surprise after 2 minutes of game.

[Hussar]

well, i pleyed it many times and i didnt noticed that things Agneau, did u tryed it?

[TheKomodo]

Ok i've spent over 20 minutes typing out different paragraphs and I can't do it without insulting people and continously highlighting and deleting it all and starting all over, so f@#! it, I won't get involved.

You are doomed to put up with this stupid scheme forever.

Even if someone actually came up with a perfect scheme, no one'll buy it.

[DENnis]

Very nice text Berria and nice try to make the worst scheme to a much better scheme!

Of course yes to more skill (=less luck) and no to the classic roper!!!

[Agneau]

well, i pleyed it many times and i didnt noticed that things Agneau, did u tryed it?

Of course not ! lol
too inactive at the moment, but i remind having plazyed it long time ago on wwp for fun (u know just to improve skills) and it was more "rope on top" that "rope and hide".

I'll try when I'll get fired!

[franz]

pretty cool idea. interesting no one thought of it until now

[TheKomodo]

pretty cool idea. interesting no one thought of it until now

It's been done before franz, i've played Ropers like that before, not in Leagues though.

[Dub-c]

That wouldnt be a roper anymore.

[TheKomodo]

That wouldnt be a roper anymore.

Just change the name of the scheme then.

[avirex]

It's still roper... But if both worms are tucked away on the bottom left of the map and the crate goes bottom right, you have no chance to get create and attack.so with the w2w rule, it's no doubt still a hard attack, but atleast it's practical.. You can get your crate in the retreat time...

With this rule now rather then being punished with no chance to attack when you get a hard crate, you are only punished with a slightly harder turn, more roping, and more then likely not a very good hide.. Because you have to run back to get create...

If you think about it.. This rule would result in more use of the map...

I have seen too many times both players hiding bottom left, and hoping to win the crate rape battle... It's quite boring...

And dub, I'm really surprised that you support this current rope scheme as much as you do, knowing how much skill and strategy that is removed grok the scheme compared to worms 2 roping... But whatever

[ShyGuy]

This rule sucks just for one reason:

If you lead, you just have to hide top or hide really near from a wall and do w2w all the time.
on this way, it is impossible for the other guy to win.
It will just become a boring schem without any surprise after 2 minutes of game.

I mean if you lead you can hide top and regular roper and the same thing will happen... that's why people hide top in roper when they lead...

[TheKomodo]

I'm with avi and Shy on this.