So have we concluded yet that Free's only viable argument that we don't know anything therefore anything might be?
My viable argument to what? You haven't added anything valuable to this thread except your trolling and twisting of my words.
I've already said multiple times that if one is interested on reading scientific approach to topics we're talking about, read My Big TOE since you guys claim there has been no scientific field-work done considering topics like these.
Edit: scientific field-work that backs up some of my wacky and psychotic claims*
Ok. Now I never claimed that there was no science being done on the paranormal. In fact I argue that I know more about parapsychological research than you. I was a listener to the Skeptiko podcast for many months which talked about all the latest scientific research being done in the world of the paranormal. Yes....my critical views do come from having looked into both sides of the arguments.
All I claimed was that there haven't been any conclusive results from parapsychological research. And I stand by that.
Although science has been done regarding the paranormal, how good is the science? How well controlled were the experiments? Could the experiments be replicated and the same results obtained?
Gary Schwartz...you heard of him? Very famous psychic researcher. Reckons he's got results that prove almost conclusively that supernatural powers are at work. His critics? They disagree. Why? Look into it. It's interesting.
Rupert Sheldrake is another 'scientist' doing paranormal work. Some people love him, stand by his findings and conclude he has done good science. Other people claim he is nothing more than a lunatic who runs around doing crappy studies on supposedly psychic dogs.
Free, you've read this Big TOE book and from what I gather, this guy Thomas Campbell has his theory of everything. Like other paranormal researchers I'm sure there are some people who think it's incredible and exciting. I'm sure there are some who think it's new age mumbo jumbo. No doubt there are some extremely intelligent people who have studied the sciences for all their lives who would pick holes in this theory and spot the problems with it.
I unfortunately can't do that but I will watch his lectures and keep an open mind. I will also try and gain an insight into what experts are saying about this theory.
After all, there so far isn't an accepted theory of everything, science is striving for one but so far there isn't one. Yet this guy Campbell claims to have developed one. Something definitely ain't right here!