Most people with common sense will know the difference between land based game modes and rope based game modes. A rope based scheme resolves around the handling of the rope and its various techniques it allows player to use. While on land based schemes, rope doesn't have a dominating factor, but rope can be used in many ways in Intermediate, but it doesn't make it a roping scheme. Anyone should know this, even you.

Again, I am not generalizing, it is fantasy on your end. To me, rope schemes feels faster, but we perceives things differentlyt and it is interesting to see other people's point of view.

Do you not understand the question of this topic? Try my little friend. Do you enjoy the following land schemes: Intermediate, Elite, BnG, Hysteria, & Aerial more than; Shopper, Roper, TTRR, and WxW?

Sure one can argue: Well I like TTRR but I don't like other rope schemes. Then you are more favoring land based scheme.

Quote from: Kradie on January 06, 2020, 02:46 PM

I prefer rope based scheme because it is fast and fun

Yet Shopper exists. Think you've generalizing things too much.

How am I generalizing? I was curious to see what people like the most out of the two, rope based scheme or land based schemes. Should my curiosity be denied? Should people stop making surveys? Should people stop partaking in surveys? Should we not ask what people like? Should we stop making conversation? My intent was not to divide people, cause a big uproar with pitchforks etc. I was only curious to see what everyone likes more. Worms Armageddon is basically rope or land, and I find myself playing rope schemes more. Many other don't play rope modes at all, and that's totally fine., I got nothing against that. If someone likes normal schemes more, vote that, but if someone find themselves roping more, vote for rope.

WA is alive biatchez xdd

WA Always been alive Mr Csongola.

Okay I am in

But I am not joining for the money, just for fun and support league activity.

I never got into Star Wars much. I only properly watched the original trilogy once I was an adult. But similar to what I said in the Movie Remakes thread, I just don't like franchises in general. They're almost never good. They just seem like unimaginative money makers. The best exception to me is probably bloody SpongeBob SquarePants. I look forward to enjoying the 3rd movie. SpongeBob is love.

I absolutely want lots of space lesbians though.

You say ''unimaginative money makers''. I don't believe Star Wars started out like that, nor that George Lucas intended to be a money milking machine. He only wanted to tell a story, and he did so successfully. The time his story was told on the big screen was never seen and done before. That is why Star Wars became such a big deal. Nowadays the original trilogy might not seem much to the average viewer because they are already saturated enough with reference and inspiration from the old older movies that they skipped or missed.

I am all for Space-Lesbians, but then again, who are the target audience? Lesbians? Horny intellects? Perhaps viewing porn is a better alternative. All of the LGBTQ are not majority, and movie studios are losing money because they pander to these far left SJW lunatics. So again, Lesbians? Transgenders? Sure why not, but remember, I personally and hopefully others, want a good story with compelling characters. Not ''Hey guys! We got Asians male who identifies himself as a female''. Everything needs context. So I totally get what skunk3 is conveying.

There is no need to destroy entertainment for your own personal agenda. Take Home Alone for example. Such movie today wouldn't be made. Why? Because all of the casts are white! Now we need bit of Mexican, Asian, African, oh and some white people, because we don't want them to be sexist, racists etc.

I haven't seen the last movie The Rise of Skywalker, because I have lost all interest. I have however allowed myself to be spoiled by viewing a lot of videos on the last movie.- From what I have gathered, I am not impressed at all. Disney didn't have a outline for their sequel trilogy, but George Lucas did have it for his own prequel trilogy. Lucas did however give his outline and ideas to Disney for the next trilogy, but none of it were used, although Disney Lucas claims otherwise. 

The Disney Star Wars is characterized by identity politics and other nonsense that ruined Star Wars and its so called magic. J. J. Abrams also directed Star Trek, which set Star Trek to its downfall. Both J. J. Abrams & Rian Johnson (Directed Last Jedi), did not work together, and had their own vision of Star Wars. Fans have spoken out why they didn't like Star Wars, but they were called toxic man babies. No wonder Star Wars is dead.

I really do feel sorry for George Lucas, and I am sorry that fans were mean to him with his prequel trilogy. But in the end, he is the father and is a good story teller, but not good at executing them though.

Look at how evil and cold this woman is. Also she has been a political activist since her adolescence, and it is amazing such person could ruin Star Wars. But Bob Igor can't really fire her, because WOMAN. Although she has fired tons of worthy directors that could had worked with the Star Wars sequel trilogy....
&t=7s

Spoilers here.

My opponent FEM quit the game, as he normally does in any other games.

Should I just report or?

A Norwegian light fire on The Quran book in public. Understandably this action caused uproar among the Muslim community. An Islamic group called for execution of this person who light fire on the holy book. The good news is that the Norwegian police managed to stop the book to be totally burnt. A quick google search will give you more insight on the issue at hand.

Regardless, what do you think of the death penalty? Should it ever be practiced regardless of how serious the atrocity committed by the person(s) at hand?