me and casso have been messaging but the only confirmed date we both failed to attend. I then suggested sunday at 20 gmt but nothing confirmed from casso.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: Hussar on November 20, 2015, 11:49 AM
I trying to contact with Chicken23, no reply yet.
Chicken - i offer next date - Monday 19 gmt.
Quote from: GreatProfe on November 02, 2015, 06:27 PMQuote from: Hussar on November 01, 2015, 08:40 PM
GretProfe....... i work from 7 gmt till 15 gmt.. so just choose time.
Berria, I'll be online startin from 20 GMT, see you there!Quote from: Senator on November 01, 2015, 06:56 PM
Hopefully u and Hussar play the last game because it's decisive between Hussar and Csongi.
"Balanced" stands for equal crate probabilities (except for a few weaps), not for equal weapons for both playersAnd this cup scheme is not exactly Tom's scheme but very close to it.
Mind tell why u feel the tus scheme is better? Because both get only good weaps so less luck? This comes to dealing with poor weaps (either use the "poor" weaps better or use girders instead).
You quoted well when said "TUS scheme is better because both good weaps". That's what I felt comparated to your scheme. Imo, there's no problem if scheme gives you and opponent a HHG. Shall win the one who use the HHG "better".
Your scheme gives mortars, mole bomb, bat... in the same probabilty of dyna, granny, etc. Those weapons cant be in the same group of the main weapons. You're adding luck in the game when player A collect flame (120 damage) and player B collect mole (15 damage) and well, that's not the point what you're targetting, isnt it?
TUS scheme offers few ratio (0,6%) for awful weapons and this is correct. Obviouslly the scheme has problems but it seems like the best one so far.
Quote from: Senator on October 08, 2015, 01:12 PMQuote from: HHC on October 08, 2015, 11:34 AM
With so many handguns/bats/crap weaps in it's hardly possible to do any serious harm before SD. And with the low TUS scores on SD weaps.. it's likely you end up with many drawn games.
I can see this only working with more time on the clock tbh.
That's what I said about Chicken23's schemeQuote from: Senator on February 16, 2015, 01:45 PM
I guess there is a reason for the current crate probabilities. In your scheme probability for powerful non-SD weapons is lower so it's more difficult to kill the opponent with non-SD weapons. That means games will be more often SD weapon battles than before, or?
Wasn't water rise also slower when all weapons had the same probability? You had then more time to kill the opponent with non-SD weapons than in TUS scheme.
I think the greater number of shitty weapons doesn't affect that much after all. But we'll see about that
How many early kills do u see with the TUS "boom boom" scheme anyway? A worm gets attacked once by a big bomb and then it's moved to a cover. No TUS game ends before SD and usually u have at least 3 worms left heading to SD.
Quote from: Korydex on June 02, 2015, 08:05 PMQuote from: Csongi on June 02, 2015, 07:53 PMroper is more challenging than shoppers, and shoppers are not really classical because they were not part of old leagues like wacl and cl2kQuote from: Korydex on June 02, 2015, 05:02 PM
remove shopper and wxw cos there's roper
wut ? ;o
Quote from: Lukz on September 03, 2015, 05:01 PM
Chicken are u live? xD