Forums
106
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.1.0 released
« on: September 20, 2021, 11:16 AM »Looking forward a wormkit module that plays every game for me and wipes my ass
WTF
very eloquent
Forums
April 28, 2024, 09:57 PM
News:
Leagues updated to v2.0
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
WTF
very eloquent
107
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.1.0 released
« on: September 19, 2021, 10:38 PM »
There are people who might prefer to play with it. I am particularly looking forward to the module that tracks enemy weapons. Even though it's not allowed in leagues, I'll have more fun in funners with these modules. I will be able to switch between windows, do other things, and still know what the opponent used.
108
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.1.0 released
« on: September 19, 2021, 08:54 PM »This is an issue because you can have confusing worm names and change them every game and still be aware of your own worm order.
Shouldn't that be prohibited in the first place? It might be simpler just to forbid this "tactic" of confusing the opponent by using gibberish worm names. Both blank names and gibberish worm names should not be allowed.
That would be too hard to enforce.
If someone uses this "tactic", you can counter that using the module
109
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.1.0 released
« on: September 19, 2021, 08:09 PM »This is an issue because you can have confusing worm names and change them every game and still be aware of your own worm order.
Shouldn't that be prohibited in the first place? It might be simpler just to forbid this "tactic" of confusing the opponent by using gibberish worm names. Both blank names and gibberish worm names should not be allowed.
110
TUS Discussion / Re: WormKit modules board request
« on: September 13, 2021, 02:37 PM »
I support the idea! The description of this subforum could include the request and suggestion of modules, discussion about modules before they are published etc.
111
General discussion / Re: Can anyone help me with this? Modification in program to count enemy arsenal
« on: September 13, 2021, 12:06 PM »I never said it was a cheat, though would like rules so using it literally would be cheating, though I doubt that is going to happen now.
There is a difference in using 3rd party software compared to using your body as the main tool to play the game.
Our bodies have limits that software doesn't.
Could you explain better what these limitations would be? How difficult is it to have a paper and make brief notes that don't take even 1 second? For example, I doubt that Dario has any difficulty making these notes he said he makes:
Other people print a paper with the names of the weapons, and the only job is to make a strikethrough on the used weapon:
The person can also use in-game chat to make brief abbreviated notes: ws, r1, r2 etc.
So... I would like to understand better why this method I seek is something so different from other manual methods.
I going to need my body to use the software. I will need to use the arm to move the mouse and my hand to click on the weapon used. The person who uses paper and pen also needs the same parts of the body to use pen and paper method.
The only reason I don't use pen and paper is that I don't like external resources that take my immersion out of the game. And this is something personal of mine. Other people may not mind.
112
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.0.1 released
« on: September 12, 2021, 10:21 PM »The way you released the information on the ONL channel was totally reckless:
You spoke in a derogatory way, creating some kind of bias on people about a module that hadn't even been published yet and not knowing all the details behind the idea (for example, that this could behave like the /arrows command).
That is the ONL Discord, until the owners and moderators of ONL Discord decide we're not allowed to mock each other and have a laugh, i'll continue to do so, just as everyone else who acts in a similar fashion in locations not related to TUS.
I don't agree with that way of speaking. Your words are aimed at the work of others and to people who, even if you don't agree, are thinking about things that will be useful to others.
It was clear that, at this time, you didn't have the whole idea of the module (eg, that it would send a message mentioning its use). Now that you know, you're not against it anymore. So why prejudge something with such strong words if you don't know the whole idea yet?
Albus, what you agree with doesn't concern me in a place where you don't decide the rules. If you have a complaint about my behaviour in the ONL Discord server, please make a complaint to the moderators of the ONL Discord server. I will accept all consequences.
Just to be clear, do you regret that attitude you had?
I found a new and good way to use the new version of the module. The possibility of seeing the sequence of all the teams in the match will allow me to study other people's games more easily, as I will know what they had in mind for the next turns.
113
General discussion / Re: Can anyone help me with this? Modification in program to count enemy arsenal
« on: September 12, 2021, 08:36 PM »regarding Komito's argument, I've never seen a case where someone would be mad over writing down what the enemy did in the past in a turn-based strategy game...
That's not even what my argument is. There is more depth to the points i've made.
So, what is your concern when you said that:
As I said. If my oponnent don't allow me use the module, i'll use it.....
That's all I needed to know, thanks.
You look worried about something. Why do you need to know this?
114
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.0.1 released
« on: September 12, 2021, 07:40 PM »Nizikawa said that, in September 9, you contacted him and he explained to you that the module could warn other users that it was being used:
So, why didn't you end this discussion days ago?
It's not the only point to discuss, i've already said this, do you even read what everyone writes, or only the people you agree with?
Though there is no need to continue this discussion as nizikawa has already mentioned that he will be adding a feature which displays when someone activates this module, which means the very issue I had has been resolved.
You, from the moment you became aware that the module is going to mention that the person is using it, have no further objection to it, correct? So why did you continue to behave against the module until yesterday? You could have at least informed that you were no longer against the module, from the day nizikawa sent you this message 3 days ago.
I consider this a victory, and appreciate that nizikawa will be adding the feature.
You consider this a victory, but this had already been proposed from the beginning. The fact is you just didn't know it.
115
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.0.1 released
« on: September 11, 2021, 02:10 PM »
Nizikawa said that, in September 9, you contacted him and he explained to you that the module could warn other users that it was being used:
So, why didn't you end this discussion days ago?
So, why didn't you end this discussion days ago?
116
General discussion / Re: Can anyone help me with this? Modification in program to count enemy arsenal
« on: September 11, 2021, 01:53 PM »As I said. If my oponnent don't allow me use the module, i'll use it.....
That's all I needed to know, thanks.
You insist on looking for problems with my ideas. You treat me like a cheater.
If this is not allowed, would it also be prohibited to use chat to do the same thing (track weapon usage)? Things are getting boring around here...
117
General discussion / Re: Can anyone help me with this? Modification in program to count enemy arsenal
« on: September 11, 2021, 01:34 PM »What a question, omg. You think there is a chance for me to be a cheater**? If the opponent doesn't want me to use it, I don't. That simple!
Then why do you need this if nizikawa is already making one that does exactly that?
As I said. If my oponnent don't allow me use the module, i'll use this idea I had. Is there a problem with doing this? I'll manually track the enemy weapons, but instead of paper, i'll do it on computer screen. If there's a problem, let me know what it would be.
118
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.0.1 released
« on: September 11, 2021, 01:28 PM »I don't agree with that way of speaking.Albus, what you agree with doesn't concern me in a place where you don't decide the rules. If you have a complaint about my behaviour in the ONL Discord server, please make a complaint to the moderators of the ONL Discord server. I will accept all consequences.
Ok, I'll. But it was good that I spoke here too. In my opinion, someone, especially in your position (streamer, moderator on TUS), should be more polite and contained with words in any public place related to the game.
119
General discussion / Re: Can anyone help me with this? Modification in program to count enemy arsenal
« on: September 11, 2021, 01:16 PM »The idea of a module that allows players to see the weapons used by the opponent is being discussed, but since I don't know if all my opponents will let me use something like this, I would like to have this option as an alternative.
If TUS(MonkeyIsland) decided to make using stuff like this illegal on TUS League matches, or at the very least illegal via disagreement on it's use, would you still want to find a way to do it anyway?
What a question, omg. You think there is a chance for me to be a cheater*? If the opponent doesn't want me to use it, I don't. That simple!
* in the sense of breaking pre-established rules.
120
Wormkit Modules / Re: wkWormOrder v. 1.0.1 released
« on: September 11, 2021, 01:11 PM »The way you released the information on the ONL channel was totally reckless:That is the ONL Discord, until the owners and moderators of ONL Discord decide we're not allowed to mock each other and have a laugh, i'll continue to do so, just as everyone else who acts in a similar fashion in locations not related to TUS.
You spoke in a derogatory way, creating some kind of bias on people about a module that hadn't even been published yet and not knowing all the details behind the idea (for example, that this could behave like the /arrows command).
I don't agree with that way of speaking. Your words are aimed at the work of others and to people who, even if you don't agree, are thinking about things that will be useful to others.
It was clear that, at this time, you didn't have the whole idea of the module (eg, that it would send a message mentioning its use). Now that you know, you're not against it anymore. So why prejudge something with such strong words if you don't know the whole idea yet?