Quote from: Senator on January 02, 2021, 09:39 AMFair enough! And don't worry, ZaR Ropers are often marked with the letter Z or ZaR tag. I would like to add that in ZaR there can only spawn maximum of 2 crates on a map and no more. This is to avoid crate hording and perhaps equal opportunity to get a difficult crate. I think this should be applied for Roper scheme too.
Nothing wrong with copying parts of existing schemes and combining them into a new one. After playing both WA and W2 Roper I took the best of both worlds (in my opinion) and made "Roper no CBA" where the CBA rule is kinda built-in but you are allowed to ignore impossible crates. It's good to have some different name for the variant so people know what it's about. I wouldn't want to join a host called "Roper" and then end up playing ZaR.
Quote from: TheMadCharles on January 02, 2021, 06:28 PMWhat about Big ZaR RR? With Zook, 30s turn, 10s retreat, & batty? And some maps featuring difficult long climbs?Quote from: Kradie on January 01, 2021, 04:42 PMi probs won't be able to answer with a proper answer, but think of BigRR, with 40sec no nana and 30sec with nana
When does a scheme become copy paste of existing scheme?Quote from: Kradie on January 01, 2021, 04:42 PMwhen did authoring schemes happen? is it properly documented who made most of the league schemes besides the authoring on TUS?
When is a scheme considered plagiarized?Quote from: Kradie on January 01, 2021, 04:42 PMif it's not published, not really
Is it plagiarism if the scheme is based on ideas & concept of past & present that didn't go anywhere?
i need foxhound here
Authoring Scheme is something I recently noticed when select people pointed fingers at my own scheme as if they were stolen from others.
Yeah why not get FoxHound or anyone else here to shed some light what plagiarism really is, because I am not sure.