I was just wondering. Thanks for the answer. Still, usually you admit you are wrong in minor details, but the major point of the discussion you go endlessly, and you don't seem to change your point of view. Usually the discussion doesn't end, people just stop replying your posts.
Well yeah, often we all get minor details wrong... It's like you're trying to tell me the sky is blue right now, that humans need oxygen to survive and that 2 + 2 = 4.
Yes, of course I go on endlessly, I like to talk and debate... Do you think I'm the only one though? I mean think about it... If I am going on "endlessly" then surely it takes 2 to tango right?
So why do you blame ME alone, when there are so many other people who also go "endlessly" with me, because I obviously don't do it alone... Why is it ok for other people to "go on endlessly" WITH ME but for me it's such a problem to do it back to them lol?
Your logic is flawed FoxHound.
I think you have more obsession on this than me. I'm not the only one complaining here publicly that your posts are often exhaustive/excessive. I usually participate the discussions and argument, specially when is a subject that I have interest or that I have knowledge about. You never seen me discussing about keyboards for example.
Nah, I'm perfectly fine, it doesn't take long to write or read my posts at all. You say it the most recently though, it's pretty funny.
Let's do some math though... When I look at the "Members" there are 252 pages, 30 members per page, on the last page there is only 4 so 7560 minus 26 is that's 7534.
Out of 7534 people who have signed up to TUS, minus let's say, 100 of those accounts that are probably Sir-J.
7434 people who have signed up to TUS.
Now, it's always the same 2-10 people who complain about the size of my posts, at the very most, I'd say about 30 or 40 people unique players over the entire span of TUS timeframe have ever complained about the length of my posts.
If we just say 40 though(keep in mind this is being generous), that's 0.538068335% of TUS users have complained about my posts being "exhaustive/excessive".
Now that we know it's a VERY SMALL minority of users who actually have an issue with my posts and openly speak out about it.
I'm not going to get my knickers in a twist over 0.5% of TUS players who complain about the way I write. Not to mention that the majority of that 0.5% are people I don't even consider friends or friendly so I'm pretty happy here.
Now, obviously all those TUS accounts, probably half of them are inactive...
Even if 25% of people didn't like my posts, it still wouldn't be enough to be a problem.
So clearly the problem is you, and the rest of the minority that have the issue, after all, it's your issue, not mine.
Ok, but you should know your behavior may cause conflicts and problems socially speaking, no matter if you cares about it or not.
Don't worry about me, I fully understand the butterfly effect.
- Since you activate drill at Darts, and not shoot rope again, I decided to check rope angle, but now I realize that rope angles are not really trustworthy due to hidden frames.
- Thanks to TA, I was able to see the potential rope angle, and I believe it should be the only requirement.
- Swooshes on Darts maps are a remix of the original swoosh. And as I said, while we're playing any roping scheme. we'd only check the shooting angle, so that's why I also applied this principle to Darts.
- Even at Darts, you wouldn't pay attention to pre-release rope angle if the swoosh WAS NOT THE LAST TRICK BEFORE THE DRILL. For example, if it was Swoosh to Deviation, you'd only pay attention to post-release firing angle.
As I've said multiple times already, this is neither an arch, a mexi or a swoosh, it's something new entirely.
I'm just calling it a mexican swoosh because it's perfectly in the middle of being both while being neither.
Personally speaking, I'd still void that turn though, the rope has to be on the direction you're actually doing the swoosh for it to be a genuine swoosh, not the opposite side. When I made the first Darts map to use a swoosh, that's what I had in mind at least.
If the entire community and game developers decide otherwise, then fair enough, I'll have to accept that is is their choice to agree on that but I'll still say it's not a genuine swoosh whenever it's my decision.
However, this is Triads challenge, he decides.[/list]