If you are doing a pump from a wall in a roper or rope race, chances are you CAN hit the wall and causes a fall. If you have parachute, it will save you, if not, you FALL.
For starters, doing pumps in an actual game, is extremely risky, with or without parachute.
Even with parachute most fails, do actually result in losing total control of worm and your turn ending, because they are so fast and hit against the walls at such tremendous speed,
Moves like pumps, are one of the harder moves to master in roping, and a parachute isn't going to be much help at all if you fail.
If you actually had as much experience as some of us, and played with as many other Ropers as some of us, you might realize this.
but no parachute will make it more interesting.. Because it is your fault if you fall or slide of an edge.
I really disagree with you here, I think the move itself makes it interesting, it has nothing to do with using parachute or not.
It is widely acknowledged and accepted because there haven't been anything to oppose it. So you are saying it have been proven, with parachute only. That is one sided.
You are wrong, the option of not using parachute has always existed, therefor there has always been an option to oppose using parachute.
So yes, it has been proven, that's a fact, not an opinion.
No one thought of having no parachute in schemes in the past.
Perhaps some tried but gave up.
Never saw someone contradict themselves so quickly before
So what you are saying is, no one thought of having no parachute in schemes, but they did and gave up?
Roping without parachute has always existed, you are nowhere near the 1st to do it.
It's been discussed in the past, but obviously nobody was interested in it.
Why do you think using no parachute is a new idea? Even ZaR Roper isn't an original creation, it's a combination of things that have been done before, people have been doing ropers without parachute since Worms 2, let alone Worms Armageddon.
Can you really prove anything without the other? Only proof that you have is that there are 20 years of only parachute, replays and a few zar games and arguments here.
I am confident enough to bet my life on it, but on the other hand it's not important enough to spend my time because it would take a lot of time going through 15+ years of replays, websites and history, talking to other people and interviewing them about their experiences and going through their replays as well.
I would only do that sort of thing if I had a huge incentive to do it, not just to prove something to you, that to most other people, is already obvious.
Also, I would need something of an incentive for the other people I would question because more than likely they would say "I don't care" when I try to talk to them about it lol.