How many more negative opinions about Hysteria in TUS Classic by renowned players do you need to get it out of that league? I wonder.
a small group of people legitimated with a big name should rule over the majority of people? i thought we removed this form of leadership not that long ago for good reasons.
Good reasons? What good reasons? I guess the only good reasons are to get this league as popular as possible no matter at what expense.
If that is the real reasoning behind all these changes then please act with coherence and chance the name of the league from "classic league" to "popularity league" or "democracy league" or whatever, because you're not judging all around skill, you're just collecting schemes and adding them together hoping that said league gets as many games played as possible.
The reason leagues have been composed of certain schemes is not just because some people in power wanted it that way because they refused to change, I know you want to believe this because you love the idea of making something completely new and exciting in the name of democracy but that's not the way it is, it's simply not true. The core of schemes that make a good all arounder make sense from a purely gameplay point of view.
If you think adding hysteria just because it's popular at the expense of it being an awful league scheme you're just breaking the balance. You know what else breaks the balance? Allowing democracy in matters the majority of people are ignorants at.
edit:
You're being naive if you don't see the clear flaws with hysteria. In fact, if you want this league to have as many games played as possible you're still being naive, why not change the scheme to 1 worm each? You save time which can be invested in getting more games played. That's not the goal is it? It's to make as many people happy. We could have a poll to choose each season's winner for next season...
Staff of this league: you can apply reasoning to a scheme like hysteria, you can ignore the polls and what the masses say, and you can execute those changes to the scheme, and here comes the shocker, ready for it? People can actually approve those changes, realize the scheme is better that way and play it more often.
I know you haven't considered this modus operandi until now, but hey, maybe it's worth considering? Open your eyes for what is worth and not for what it's worth.