The problem that FoxHound and WoSC have in my opinion, is that they can suppress and overshadow scheme creators and their schemes that could have potential to be good. How exactly? To my experience and observation, they often refer to the past with ''Source material'' or some vague tale of proof. Materials and tales by some forgotten players who probably moved on with their lives. These actions by Fox and Friends can be both insightful, honorable, but also damaging to new schemes (without Intent I would assume). How exactly? It could undermine the author and their new schemes that borrows elements of past schemes without knowing anything about prior concepts. Ultimately ''new'' schemes that may or may not be based could struggle to flourish and reach its full potential.
This is Worms Armageddon, a turn based artillery game, that has survived over 20 years thanks to the community. But that doesn't mean everybody has a degree in History of Schemes nor should they. There will always be new ''Game modes'' as I like to call them. Just like there will always be another FPS, RPG and Racing games.
Rocket League is a good example I think, it is football with vehicles. I am sure this concept is nothing new, but Rocket League did it right and got it popular. That is what new game modes for WA is about. But should we Ignore and neglect past concept? No of course not. What I'm trying to say is, It isn't always necessary to point out adamantly that this idea or scheme in the past was already made.
Unfortunately, I think if we are to progress, we must set aside our indifference, bias, ego, and, nepotism. And proceed with an Impartial mind.